Intriguing Properties of Adversarial ML Attacks in the Problem Space [Extended Version]
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent research efforts on adversarial machine learning (ML) have investigated problem-space attacks, focusing on the generation of real evasive objects in domains where, unlike images, there is no clear inverse mapping to the feature space (e.g., software). However, the design, comparison, and real-world implications of problem-space attacks remain underexplored. This article makes three major contributions. Firstly, we propose a general formalization for adversarial ML evasion attacks in the problem-space, which includes the definition of a comprehensive set of constraints on available transformations, preserved semantics, absent artifacts, and plausibility. We shed light on the relationship between feature space and problem space, and we introduce the concept of side-effect features as the by-product of the inverse feature-mapping problem. This enables us to define and prove necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of problem-space attacks. Secondly, building on our general formalization, we propose a novel problem-space attack on Android malware that overcomes past limitations in terms of semantics and artifacts. We have tested our approach on a dataset with 150K Android apps from 2016 and 2018 which show the practical feasibility of evading a state-of-the-art malware classifier along with its hardened version. Thirdly, we explore the effectiveness of adversarial training as a possible approach to enforce robustness against adversarial samples, evaluating its effectiveness on the considered machine learning models under different scenarios. Our results demonstrate that "adversarial-malware as a service" is a realistic threat, as we automatically generate thousands of realistic and inconspicuous adversarial applications at scale, where on average it takes only a few minutes to generate an adversarial instance.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 6.
7 papers.
- 2024On the Effectiveness of Adversarial Training on Malware Classifierscited by 1
- 2026Categorical Robustness Assessment for Machine Learning based Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 0
- 2026LLM-Enhanced Hierarchical Heterogeneous Graph Representation Learning for Malicious Python Package Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Traffic-Aware Randomized Smoothing for LLM-Based Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 0
- 2026REPLICANT: Learning Policies for Evading and Hardening Malware Detectorscited by 0
- 2026Concept drift mitigation through community and spectral graph analysis for the detection of cyberattacks in network trafficcited by 0
- 2026Robust Conformal Intrusion Detection via Traffic-Aware Calibration and Attack-Orbit Invariancecited by 0
- 2026Concept drift mitigation through community and spectral graph analysis for the detection of cyberattacks in network traffic8 Sep 2026
- 2026REPLICANT: Learning Policies for Evading and Hardening Malware Detectors28 Aug 2026
- 2026Robust Conformal Intrusion Detection via Traffic-Aware Calibration and Attack-Orbit Invariance22 Jul 2026
- 2026Traffic-Aware Randomized Smoothing for LLM-Based Network Intrusion Detection15 Jul 2026
- 2026LLM-Enhanced Hierarchical Heterogeneous Graph Representation Learning for Malicious Python Package Detection3 Jul 2026
- 2026Categorical Robustness Assessment for Machine Learning based Network Intrusion Detection Systems10 Jun 2026
- 2024On the Effectiveness of Adversarial Training on Malware Classifiers24 Dec 2024