mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Learning of Subsurface Flow via Theory-guided Neural Network

arXiv 1911.00103 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 32

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active researches are currently being performed to incorporate the wealth of scientific knowledge into data-driven approaches (e.g., neural networks) in order to improve the latter's effectiveness. In this study, the Theory-guided Neural Network (TgNN) is proposed for deep learning of subsurface flow. In the TgNN, as supervised learning, the neural network is trained with available observations or simulation data while being simultaneously guided by theory (e.g., governing equations, other physical constraints, engineering controls, and expert knowledge) of the underlying problem. The TgNN can achieve higher accuracy than the ordinary Artificial Neural Network (ANN) because the former provides physically feasible predictions and can be more readily generalized beyond the regimes covered with the training data. Furthermore, the TgNN model is proposed for subsurface flow with heterogeneous model parameters. Several numerical cases of two-dimensional transient saturated flow are introduced to test the performance of the TgNN. In the learning process, the loss function contains data mismatch, as well as PDE constraint, engineering control, and expert knowledge. After obtaining the parameters of the neural network by minimizing the loss function, a TgNN model is built that not only fits the data, but also adheres to physical/engineering constraints. Predicting the future response can be easily realized by the TgNN model. In addition, the TgNN model is tested in more complicated scenarios, such as prediction with changed boundary conditions, learning from noisy data or outliers, transfer learning, and engineering controls. Numerical results demonstrate that the TgNN model achieves much better predictability, reliability, and generalizability than ANN models due to the physical/engineering constraints in the former.

Key facts. Cited by 32 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 11; 2022: 10; 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

32 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023PINNacle: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving PDEscited by 84
  2. 2021Any equation is a forest: Symbolic genetic algorithm for discovering open-form partial differential equations (SGA-PDE)cited by 38
  3. 2021Physics-informed Convolutional Neural Networks for Temperature Field Prediction of Heat Source Layout without Labeled Datacited by 31
  4. 2022Partial Differential Equations Meet Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 25
  5. 2021Robust discovery of partial differential equations in complex situationscited by 21
  6. 2022Solving Seismic Wave Equations on Variable Velocity Models with Fourier Neural Operatorcited by 17
  7. 2021Finite Volume Neural Network: Modeling Subsurface Contaminant Transportcited by 14
  8. 2022Integration of knowledge and data in machine learningcited by 13
  9. 2022Use of Multifidelity Training Data and Transfer Learning for Efficient Construction of Subsurface Flow Surrogate Modelscited by 11
  10. 2021A Gradient-based Deep Neural Network Model for Simulating Multiphase Flow in Porous Mediacited by 8
  11. 2021A Physics-Constrained Deep Learning Model for Simulating Multiphase Flow in 3D Heterogeneous Porous Mediacited by 6
  12. 2021Physics-Guided Discovery of Highly Nonlinear Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 6
20 more
  1. 2022AutoKE: An automatic knowledge embedding framework for scientific machine learningcited by 6
  2. 2023Time Series Predictions in Unmonitored Sites: A Survey of Machine Learning Techniques in Water Resourcescited by 6
  3. 2021Surrogate and inverse modeling for two-phase flow in porous media via theory-guided convolutional neural networkcited by 5
  4. 2022Inferring electrochemical performance and parameters of Li-ion batteries based on deep operator networkscited by 5
  5. 2024Towards Interpretable Physical-Conceptual Catchment-Scale Hydrological Modeling using the Mass-Conserving-Perceptroncited by 4
  6. 2021Uncertainty quantification and inverse modeling for subsurface flow in 3D heterogeneous formations using a theory-guided convolutional encoder-decoder networkcited by 3
  7. 2023Differentiable modeling to unify machine learning and physical models and advance Geosciencescited by 3
  8. 2023Depression Detection Using Digital Traces on Social Media: A Knowledge-aware Deep Learning Approachcited by 3
  9. 2022TgDLF2.0: Theory-guided deep-learning for electrical load forecasting via Transformer and transfer learningcited by 2
  10. 2021Domain-guided Machine Learning for Remotely Sensed In-Season Crop Growth Estimationcited by 1
  11. 2021Transfer Learning Approaches for Knowledge Discovery in Grid-based Geo-Spatiotemporal Datacited by 1
  12. 2023Filtered Partial Differential Equations: a robust surrogate constraint in physics-informed deep learning frameworkcited by 1
  13. 2025A novel Trunk Branch-net PINN for flow and heat transfer prediction in porous mediumcited by 1
  14. 2022Identification of Physical Processes and Unknown Parameters of 3D Groundwater Contaminant Problems via Theory-guided U-netcited by 0
  15. 2022Uncertainty quantification of two-phase flow in porous media via coupled-TgNN surrogate modelcited by 0
  16. 2022Phy-Taylor: Physics-Model-Based Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
  17. 2023Worth of knowledge in deep learningcited by 0
  18. 2024Optimization of geological carbon storage operations with multimodal latent dynamic model and deep reinforcement learningcited by 0
  19. 2025WellPINN: Accurate Well Representation for Transient Fluid Pressure Diffusion in Subsurface Reservoirs with Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 0
  20. 2025Knowledge distillation as a pathway toward next-generation intelligent ecohydrological modeling systemscited by 0