Gradient penalty from a maximum margin perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A popular heuristic for improved performance in Generative adversarial networks (GANs) is to use some form of gradient penalty on the discriminator. This gradient penalty was originally motivated by a Wasserstein distance formulation. However, the use of gradient penalty in other GAN formulations is not well motivated. We present a unifying framework of expected margin maximization and show that a wide range of gradient-penalized GANs (e.g., Wasserstein, Standard, Least-Squares, and Hinge GANs) can be derived from this framework. Our results imply that employing gradient penalties induces a large-margin classifier (thus, a large-margin discriminator in GANs). We describe how expected margin maximization helps reduce vanishing gradients at fake (generated) samples, a known problem in GANs. From this framework, we derive a new L^∞ gradient norm penalty with Hinge loss which generally produces equally good (or better) generated output in GANs than L2-norm penalties (based on the Fr'echet Inception Distance).
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2.
2 papers.
- 20213D Shape Generation with Grid-based Implicit Functionscited by 48
- 2021Complex Momentum for Optimization in Gamescited by 11
- 20213D Shape Generation with Grid-based Implicit Functions22 Jul 2021
- 2021Complex Momentum for Optimization in Games16 Feb 2021