Why Attention? Analyzing and Remedying BiLSTM Deficiency in Modeling Cross-Context for NER
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
State-of-the-art approaches of NER have used sequence-labeling BiLSTM as a core module. This paper formally shows the limitation of BiLSTM in modeling cross-context patterns. Two types of simple cross-structures -- self-attention and Cross-BiLSTM -- are shown to effectively remedy the problem. On both OntoNotes 5.0 and WNUT 2017, clear and consistent improvements are achieved over bare-bone models, up to 8.7% on some of the multi-token mentions. In-depth analyses across several aspects of the improvements, especially the identification of multi-token mentions, are further given.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.