Multiagent Rollout Algorithms and Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider finite and infinite horizon dynamic programming problems, where the control at each stage consists of several distinct decisions, each one made by one of several agents. We introduce an approach, whereby at every stage, each agent's decision is made by executing a local rollout algorithm that uses a base policy, together with some coordinating information from the other agents. The amount of local computation required at every stage by each agent is independent of the number of agents, while the amount of total computation (over all agents) grows linearly with the number of agents. By contrast, with the standard rollout algorithm, the amount of total computation grows exponentially with the number of agents. Despite the drastic reduction in required computation, we show that our algorithm has the fundamental cost improvement property of rollout: an improved performance relative to the base policy. We also discuss possibilities to improve further the method's computational efficiency through limited agent coordination and parallelization of the agents' computations. Finally, we explore related approximate policy iteration algorithms for infinite horizon problems, and we prove that the cost improvement property steers the algorithm towards convergence to an agent-by-agent optimal policy.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 186
- 2023Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 69
- 2021Lessons from AlphaZero for Optimal, Model Predictive, and Adaptive Controlcited by 25
- 2022More Centralized Training, Still Decentralized Execution: Multi-Agent Conditional Policy Factorizationcited by 19
- 2022ACE: Cooperative Multi-agent Q-learning with Bidirectional Action-Dependencycited by 15
- 2025Revisiting Multi-Agent World Modeling from a Diffusion-Inspired Perspectivecited by 9
- 2022Multiagent Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Routing and Pickup Problem with Adaptation to Variable Demandcited by 6
- 2022Towards Global Optimality in Cooperative MARL with the Transformation And Distillation Frameworkcited by 5
- 2021Scalable Balanced Training of Conditional Generative Adversarial Neural Networks on Image Datacited by 1
- 2022Stable Parallel Training of Wasserstein Conditional Generative Adversarial Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2025Revisiting Multi-Agent World Modeling from a Diffusion-Inspired Perspective27 May 2025
- 2023Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learning19 Apr 2023
- 2022ACE: Cooperative Multi-agent Q-learning with Bidirectional Action-Dependency29 Nov 2022
- 2022Multiagent Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Routing and Pickup Problem with Adaptation to Variable Demand28 Nov 2022
- 2022More Centralized Training, Still Decentralized Execution: Multi-Agent Conditional Policy Factorization26 Sep 2022
- 2022Stable Parallel Training of Wasserstein Conditional Generative Adversarial Neural Networks25 Jul 2022
- 2022Towards Global Optimality in Cooperative MARL with the Transformation And Distillation Framework12 Jul 2022
- 2021Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning23 Sep 2021
- 2021Lessons from AlphaZero for Optimal, Model Predictive, and Adaptive Control20 Aug 2021
- 2021Scalable Balanced Training of Conditional Generative Adversarial Neural Networks on Image Data21 Feb 2021