May I Check Again? -- A simple but efficient way to generate and use contextual dictionaries for Named Entity Recognition. Application to French Legal Texts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper we present a new method to learn a model robust to typos for a Named Entity Recognition task. Our improvement over existing methods helps the model to take into account the context of the sentence inside a court decision in order to recognize an entity with a typo. We used state-of-the-art models and enriched the last layer of the neural network with high-level information linked with the potential of the word to be a certain type of entity. More precisely, we utilized the similarities between the word and the potential entity candidates in the tagged sentence context. The experiments on a dataset of French court decisions show a reduction of the relative F1-score error of 32%, upgrading the score obtained with the most competitive fine-tuned state-of-the-art system from 94.85% to 96.52%.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022Named Entity Recognition in Indian court judgmentscited by 26
- 2022Named Entity Recognition in Indian court judgments7 Nov 2022