mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deaf, Hard of Hearing, and Hearing Perspectives on using Automatic Speech Recognition in Conversation

arXiv 1909.01176 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2019cs.HCcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many personal devices have transitioned from visual-controlled interfaces to speech-controlled interfaces to reduce costs and interactive friction, supported by the rapid growth in capabilities of speech-controlled interfaces, e.g., Amazon Echo or Apple's Siri. A consequence is that people who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) may be unable to use these speech-controlled devices. We show that deaf speech has a high error rate compared to hearing speech, in commercial speech-controlled interfaces. Deaf speech had approximately a 78% word error rate (WER) compared to a hearing speech 18% WER. Our findings show that current speech-controlled interfaces are not usable by DHH people. Based on our findings, significant advances in speech recognition software or alternative approaches will be needed for deaf use of speech-controlled interfaces. We show that current speech-controlled interfaces are not usable by DHH people.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

6 papers.