mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fairness Warnings and Fair-MAML: Learning Fairly with Minimal Data

arXiv 1908.09092 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motivated by concerns surrounding the fairness effects of sharing and transferring fair machine learning tools, we propose two algorithms: Fairness Warnings and Fair-MAML. The first is a model-agnostic algorithm that provides interpretable boundary conditions for when a fairly trained model may not behave fairly on similar but slightly different tasks within a given domain. The second is a fair meta-learning approach to train models that can be quickly fine-tuned to specific tasks from only a few number of sample instances while balancing fairness and accuracy. We demonstrate experimentally the individual utility of each model using relevant baselines and provide the first experiment to our knowledge of K-shot fairness, i.e. training a fair model on a new task with only K data points. Then, we illustrate the usefulness of both algorithms as a combined method for training models from a few data points on new tasks while using Fairness Warnings as interpretable boundary conditions under which the newly trained model may not be fair.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 7; 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
  2. 2022Diagnosing failures of fairness transfer across distribution shift in real-world medical settingscited by 45
  3. 2021A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 24
  4. 2021Algorithm Fairness in AI for Medicine and Healthcarecited by 21
  5. 2021Fairness-Aware Online Meta-learningcited by 19
  6. 2022Comprehensive Fair Meta-learned Recommender Systemcited by 18
  7. 2024CEB: Compositional Evaluation Benchmark for Fairness in Large Language Modelscited by 17
  8. 2023A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of Explainable AIcited by 16
  9. 2021On sensitivity of meta-learning to support datacited by 15
  10. 2022Perspectives on Incorporating Expert Feedback into Model Updatescited by 7
  11. 2023Toward Operationalizing Pipeline-aware ML Fairness: A Research Agenda for Developing Practical Guidelines and Toolscited by 7
  12. 2022Log-Euclidean Signatures for Intrinsic Distances Between Unaligned Datasetscited by 5
11 more
  1. 2023Fairness and Sequential Decision Making: Limits, Lessons, and Opportunitiescited by 5
  2. 2022FEAMOE: Fair, Explainable and Adaptive Mixture of Expertscited by 4
  3. 2022Mitigating Algorithmic Bias with Limited Annotationscited by 2
  4. 2022A Survey on Preserving Fairness Guarantees in Changing Environmentscited by 2
  5. 2023Fair Few-shot Learning with Auxiliary Setscited by 2
  6. 2023Fairness under Covariate Shift: Improving Fairness-Accuracy tradeoff with few Unlabeled Test Samplescited by 2
  7. 2021MetaBalance: High-Performance Neural Networks for Class-Imbalanced Datacited by 1
  8. 2023Bias Mitigation Methods for Binary Classification Decision-Making Systems: Survey and Recommendationscited by 1
  9. 2024Mapping the Potential of Explainable AI for Fairness Along the AI Lifecyclecited by 1
  10. 2025A Critical Review of Predominant Bias in Neural Networkscited by 0
  11. 2025How do datasets, developers, and models affect biases in a low-resourced language?: The Case of the Bengali Languagecited by 0