User Diverse Preference Modeling by Multimodal Attentive Metric Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most existing recommender systems represent a user's preference with a feature vector, which is assumed to be fixed when predicting this user's preferences for different items. However, the same vector cannot accurately capture a user's varying preferences on all items, especially when considering the diverse characteristics of various items. To tackle this problem, in this paper, we propose a novel Multimodal Attentive Metric Learning (MAML) method to model user diverse preferences for various items. In particular, for each user-item pair, we propose an attention neural network, which exploits the item's multimodal features to estimate the user's special attention to different aspects of this item. The obtained attention is then integrated into a metric-based learning method to predict the user preference on this item. The advantage of metric learning is that it can naturally overcome the problem of dot product similarity, which is adopted by matrix factorization (MF) based recommendation models but does not satisfy the triangle inequality property. In addition, it is worth mentioning that the attention mechanism cannot only help model user's diverse preferences towards different items, but also overcome the geometrically restrictive problem caused by collaborative metric learning. Extensive experiments on large-scale real-world datasets show that our model can substantially outperform the state-of-the-art baselines, demonstrating the potential of modeling user diverse preference for recommendation.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2022Rethinking Collaborative Metric Learning: Toward an Efficient Alternative without Negative Samplingcited by 14
- 2025PairBench: Are Vision-Language Models Reliable at Comparing What They See?cited by 6
- 2024Do Vision-Language Transformers Exhibit Visual Commonsense? An Empirical Study of VCRcited by 4
- 2024Pre-train, Align, and Disentangle: Empowering Sequential Recommendation with Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025Dynamic Multimodal Fusion via Meta-Learning Towards Micro-Video Recommendationcited by 4
- 2025LaViC: Adapting Large Vision-Language Models to Visually-Aware Conversational Recommendationcited by 4
- 2023Pareto Invariant Representation Learning for Multimedia Recommendationcited by 3
- 2024Federated Vision-Language-Recommendation with Personalized Fusioncited by 1
- 2025Leveraging Geometric Insights in Hyperbolic Triplet Loss for Improved Recommendationscited by 0
- 2026Cross-Modal Attention Network with Dual Graph Learning in Multimodal Recommendationcited by 0
- 2026Cross-Modal Attention Network with Dual Graph Learning in Multimodal Recommendation16 Jan 2026
- 2025Leveraging Geometric Insights in Hyperbolic Triplet Loss for Improved Recommendations16 Aug 2025
- 2025LaViC: Adapting Large Vision-Language Models to Visually-Aware Conversational Recommendation30 Mar 2025
- 2025PairBench: Are Vision-Language Models Reliable at Comparing What They See?21 Feb 2025
- 2025Dynamic Multimodal Fusion via Meta-Learning Towards Micro-Video Recommendation13 Jan 2025
- 2024Pre-train, Align, and Disentangle: Empowering Sequential Recommendation with Large Language Models5 Dec 2024
- 2024Federated Vision-Language-Recommendation with Personalized Fusion11 Oct 2024
- 2024Do Vision-Language Transformers Exhibit Visual Commonsense? An Empirical Study of VCR27 May 2024
- 2023Pareto Invariant Representation Learning for Multimedia Recommendation9 Aug 2023
- 2022Rethinking Collaborative Metric Learning: Toward an Efficient Alternative without Negative Sampling23 Jun 2022