mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What's Wrong with Hebrew NLP? And How to Make it Right

arXiv 1908.05453 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2019cs.CLcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For languages with simple morphology, such as English, automatic annotation pipelines such as spaCy or Stanford's CoreNLP successfully serve projects in academia and the industry. For many morphologically-rich languages (MRLs), similar pipelines show sub-optimal performance that limits their applicability for text analysis in research and the industry.The sub-optimal performance is mainly due to errors in early morphological disambiguation decisions, which cannot be recovered later in the pipeline, yielding incoherent annotations on the whole. In this paper we describe the design and use of the Onlp suite, a joint morpho-syntactic parsing framework for processing Modern Hebrew texts. The joint inference over morphology and syntax substantially limits error propagation, and leads to high accuracy. Onlp provides rich and expressive output which already serves diverse academic and commercial needs. Its accompanying online demo further serves educational activities, introducing Hebrew NLP intricacies to researchers and non-researchers alike.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

16 papers.

Sort: