Minimizers of the Empirical Risk and Risk Monotonicity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Plotting a learner's average performance against the number of training samples results in a learning curve. Studying such curves on one or more data sets is a way to get to a better understanding of the generalization properties of this learner. The behavior of learning curves is, however, not very well understood and can display (for most researchers) quite unexpected behavior. Our work introduces the formal notion of risk monotonicity, which asks the risk to not deteriorate with increasing training set sizes in expectation over the training samples. We then present the surprising result that various standard learners, specifically those that minimize the empirical risk, can act nonmonotonically irrespective of the training sample size. We provide a theoretical underpinning for specific instantiations from classification, regression, and density estimation. Altogether, the proposed monotonicity notion opens up a whole new direction of research.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2021The Shape of Learning Curves: a Reviewcited by 67
- 2021Data augmentation in Bayesian neural networks and the cold posterior effectcited by 36
- 2022Learning Curves for Decision Making in Supervised Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 27
- 2022The no-free-lunch theorems of supervised learningcited by 16
- 2021Learning curves for Gaussian process regression with power-law priors and targetscited by 14
- 2025On Learning-Curve Monotonicity for Maximum Likelihood Estimatorscited by 3
- 2022A Survey of Learning Curves with Bad Behavior: or How More Data Need Not Lead to Better Performancecited by 2
- 2025Monotonic Learning in the PAC Framework: A New Perspectivecited by 1
- 2025LCDB 1.1: A Database Illustrating Learning Curves Are More Ill-Behaved Than Previously Thoughtcited by 1
- 2026Origins and mitigation of double descent in reduced order modelingcited by 0
- 2026The Impossible Trinity of Time-Series Validation: A Conservation Law among Training Sufficiency, Test Coverage, and Temporal Causalitycited by 0
- 2026The Impossible Trinity of Time-Series Validation: A Conservation Law among Training Sufficiency, Test Coverage, and Temporal Causality2 Sep 2026
- 2026Origins and mitigation of double descent in reduced order modeling29 Jul 2026
- 2025On Learning-Curve Monotonicity for Maximum Likelihood Estimators11 Dec 2025
- 2025LCDB 1.1: A Database Illustrating Learning Curves Are More Ill-Behaved Than Previously Thought21 May 2025
- 2025Monotonic Learning in the PAC Framework: A New Perspective9 Jan 2025
- 2022A Survey of Learning Curves with Bad Behavior: or How More Data Need Not Lead to Better Performance25 Nov 2022
- 2022The no-free-lunch theorems of supervised learning9 Feb 2022
- 2022Learning Curves for Decision Making in Supervised Machine Learning: A Survey28 Jan 2022
- 2021Learning curves for Gaussian process regression with power-law priors and targets23 Oct 2021
- 2021Data augmentation in Bayesian neural networks and the cold posterior effect10 Jun 2021
- 2021The Shape of Learning Curves: a Review19 Mar 2021