mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparing Machine Learning Approaches for Table Recognition in Historical Register Books

arXiv 1906.11901 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2019cs.CV cs.IR cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present in this paper experiments on Table Recognition in hand-written registry books. We first explain how the problem of row and column detection is modeled, and then compare two Machine Learning approaches (Conditional Random Field and Graph Convolutional Network) for detecting these table elements. Evaluation was conducted on death records provided by the Archive of the Diocese of Passau. Both methods show similar results, a 89 F1 score, a quality which allows for Information Extraction. Software and dataset are open source/data.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.