Comparing Machine Learning Approaches for Table Recognition in Historical Register Books
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present in this paper experiments on Table Recognition in hand-written registry books. We first explain how the problem of row and column detection is modeled, and then compare two Machine Learning approaches (Conditional Random Field and Graph Convolutional Network) for detecting these table elements. Evaluation was conducted on death records provided by the Archive of the Diocese of Passau. Both methods show similar results, a 89 F1 score, a quality which allows for Information Extraction. Software and dataset are open source/data.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023Improving Table Structure Recognition with Visual-Alignment Sequential Coordinate Modelingcited by 41
- 2022A Survey of Historical Document Image Datasetscited by 18
- 2021Applications of Machine Learning in Document Digitisationcited by 2
- 2022LayoutXLM vs. GNN: An Empirical Evaluation of Relation Extraction for Documentscited by 1
- 2026InstructTable: Improving Table Structure Recognition Through Instructionscited by 1
- 2025Creating a Historical Migration Dataset from Finnish Church Records, 1800-1920cited by 0
- 2026InstructTable: Improving Table Structure Recognition Through Instructions3 Apr 2026
- 2025Creating a Historical Migration Dataset from Finnish Church Records, 1800-19209 Jun 2025
- 2023Improving Table Structure Recognition with Visual-Alignment Sequential Coordinate Modeling13 Mar 2023
- 2022LayoutXLM vs. GNN: An Empirical Evaluation of Relation Extraction for Documents9 May 2022
- 2022A Survey of Historical Document Image Datasets16 Mar 2022
- 2021Applications of Machine Learning in Document Digitisation5 Feb 2021