Manipulating the Difficulty of C-Tests
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose two novel manipulation strategies for increasing and decreasing the difficulty of C-tests automatically. This is a crucial step towards generating learner-adaptive exercises for self-directed language learning and preparing language assessment tests. To reach the desired difficulty level, we manipulate the size and the distribution of gaps based on absolute and relative gap difficulty predictions. We evaluate our approach in corpus-based experiments and in a user study with 60 participants. We find that both strategies are able to generate C-tests with the desired difficulty level.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023A quantitative study of NLP approaches to question difficulty estimationcited by 12
- 2021Annotation Curricula to Implicitly Train Non-Expert Annotatorscited by 8
- 2022Constructing Open Cloze Tests Using Generation and Discrimination Capabilities of Transformerscited by 5
- 2024Controlling Cloze-test Question Item Difficulty with PLM-based Surrogate Models for IRT Assessmentcited by 1
- 2024Constrained C-Test Generation via Mixed-Integer Programmingcited by 0
- 2024Constrained C-Test Generation via Mixed-Integer Programming12 Apr 2024
- 2024Controlling Cloze-test Question Item Difficulty with PLM-based Surrogate Models for IRT Assessment3 Mar 2024
- 2023A quantitative study of NLP approaches to question difficulty estimation17 May 2023
- 2022Constructing Open Cloze Tests Using Generation and Discrimination Capabilities of Transformers14 Apr 2022
- 2021Annotation Curricula to Implicitly Train Non-Expert Annotators4 Jun 2021