Back-Projection based Fidelity Term for Ill-Posed Linear Inverse Problems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ill-posed linear inverse problems appear in many image processing applications, such as deblurring, super-resolution and compressed sensing. Many restoration strategies involve minimizing a cost function, which is composed of fidelity and prior terms, balanced by a regularization parameter. While a vast amount of research has been focused on different prior models, the fidelity term is almost always chosen to be the least squares (LS) objective, that encourages fitting the linearly transformed optimization variable to the observations. In this paper, we examine a different fidelity term, which has been implicitly used by the recently proposed iterative denoising and backward projections (IDBP) framework. This term encourages agreement between the projection of the optimization variable onto the row space of the linear operator and the pseudo-inverse of the linear operator ("back-projection") applied on the observations. We analytically examine the difference between the two fidelity terms for Tikhonov regularization and identify cases (such as a badly conditioned linear operator) where the new term has an advantage over the standard LS one. Moreover, we demonstrate empirically that the behavior of the two induced cost functions for sophisticated convex and non-convex priors, such as total-variation, BM3D, and deep generative models, correlates with the obtained theoretical analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2023Image Restoration by Denoising Diffusion Models with Iteratively Preconditioned Guidancecited by 43
- 2024Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Few-Step Guidance of Consistency Models (and Beyond)cited by 12
- 2023Deep Internal Learning: Deep Learning from a Single Inputcited by 9
- 2021Image Restoration by Deep Projected GSUREcited by 8
- 2023A Comparison of Image Denoising Methodscited by 7
- 2022Deep Unfolding of the DBFB Algorithm with Application to ROI CT Imaging with Limited Angular Densitycited by 6
- 2021An unsupervised deep learning framework for medical image denoisingcited by 4
- 2025PnP-CM: Consistency Models as Plug-and-Play Priors for Inverse Problemscited by 4
- 2024Bi-level Guided Diffusion Models for Zero-Shot Medical Imaging Inverse Problemscited by 1
- 2021An Interpretation of Regularization by Denoising and its Application with the Back-Projected Fidelity Termcited by 0
- 2022MrSARP: A Hierarchical Deep Generative Prior for SAR Image Super-resolutioncited by 0
- 2025PnP-CM: Consistency Models as Plug-and-Play Priors for Inverse Problems25 Sep 2025
- 2024Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Few-Step Guidance of Consistency Models (and Beyond)29 Dec 2024
- 2024Bi-level Guided Diffusion Models for Zero-Shot Medical Imaging Inverse Problems4 Apr 2024
- 2023Image Restoration by Denoising Diffusion Models with Iteratively Preconditioned Guidance27 Dec 2023
- 2023Deep Internal Learning: Deep Learning from a Single Input12 Dec 2023
- 2023A Comparison of Image Denoising Methods18 Apr 2023
- 2022MrSARP: A Hierarchical Deep Generative Prior for SAR Image Super-resolution30 Nov 2022
- 2022Deep Unfolding of the DBFB Algorithm with Application to ROI CT Imaging with Limited Angular Density27 Sep 2022
- 2021An unsupervised deep learning framework for medical image denoising11 Mar 2021
- 2021Image Restoration by Deep Projected GSURE4 Feb 2021
- 2021An Interpretation of Regularization by Denoising and its Application with the Back-Projected Fidelity Term27 Jan 2021