mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

One Epoch Is All You Need

arXiv 1906.06669 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 41

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In unsupervised learning, collecting more data is not always a costly process unlike the training. For example, it is not hard to enlarge the 40GB WebText used for training GPT-2 by modifying its sampling methodology considering how many webpages there are in the Internet. On the other hand, given that training on this dataset already costs tens of thousands of dollars, training on a larger dataset naively is not cost-wise feasible. In this paper, we suggest to train on a larger dataset for only one epoch unlike the current practice, in which the unsupervised models are trained for from tens to hundreds of epochs. Furthermore, we suggest to adjust the model size and the number of iterations to be performed appropriately. We show that the performance of Transformer language model becomes dramatically improved in this way, especially if the original number of epochs is greater. For example, by replacing the training for 10 epochs with the one epoch training, this translates to 1.9-3.3x speedup in wall-clock time in our settings and more if the original number of epochs is greater. Under one epoch training, no overfitting occurs, and regularization method does nothing but slows down the training. Also, the curve of test loss over iterations follows power-law extensively. We compare the wall-clock time of the training of models with different parameter budget under one epoch training, and we show that size/iteration adjustment based on our proposed heuristics leads to 1-2.7x speedup in our cases. With the two methods combined, we achieve 3.3-5.1x speedup. Finally, we speculate various implications of one epoch training and size/iteration adjustment. In particular, based on our analysis we believe that we can reduce the cost to train the state-of-the-art models as BERT and GPT-2 dramatically, maybe even by the factor of 10.

Key facts. Cited by 41 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 8; 2023: 9; 2024: 10; 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

41 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,544
  2. 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 711
  3. 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 391
  4. 2022Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learntcited by 233
  5. 2024Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?cited by 188
  6. 2022Measuring Forgetting of Memorized Training Examplescited by 118
  7. 2022Cramming: Training a Language Model on a Single GPU in One Daycited by 81
  8. 2022Limitations of Neural Collapse for Understanding Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 63
  9. 2024Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Datacited by 54
  10. 2023ZipLM: Inference-Aware Structured Pruning of Language Modelscited by 46
  11. 2023No Train No Gain: Revisiting Efficient Training Algorithms For Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 41
  12. 2021MarIA: Spanish Language Modelscited by 36
29 more
  1. 2024Smaller Language Models are capable of selecting Instruction-Tuning Training Data for Larger Language Modelscited by 32
  2. 2023The Efficiency Spectrum of Large Language Models: An Algorithmic Surveycited by 25
  3. 2021Question Answering over Electronic Devices: A New Benchmark Dataset and a Multi-Task Learning based QA Frameworkcited by 21
  4. 2023The Memory Perturbation Equation: Understanding Model's Sensitivity to Datacited by 16
  5. 2022AdaPT: Fast Emulation of Approximate DNN Accelerators in PyTorchcited by 11
  6. 2024Emergent properties with repeated examplescited by 11
  7. 2024Training Compute-Optimal Protein Language Modelscited by 11
  8. 2022Sequence to sequence pretraining for a less-resourced Slovenian languagecited by 9
  9. 2023Beyond Implicit Bias: The Insignificance of SGD Noise in Online Learningcited by 9
  10. 2025SOFT: Selective Data Obfuscation for Protecting LLM Fine-tuning against Membership Inference Attackscited by 9
  11. 2022Lessons learned from the evaluation of Spanish Language Modelscited by 8
  12. 2024GIFT-SW: Gaussian noise Injected Fine-Tuning of Salient Weights for LLMscited by 8
  13. 2024Advancing Deep Active Learning & Data Subset Selection: Unifying Principles with Information-Theory Intuitionscited by 7
  14. 2023Explanatory Argument Extraction of Correct Answers in Resident Medical Examscited by 6
  15. 2024Self-Comparison for Dataset-Level Membership Inference in Large (Vision-)Language Modelscited by 6
  16. 2023Exposing Bias in Online Communities through Large-Scale Language Modelscited by 5
  17. 2026Curriculum Learning for LLM Pretraining: An Analysis of Learning Dynamicscited by 5
  18. 2023An Empathetic User-Centric Chatbot for Emotional Supportcited by 3
  19. 2025In-Context Probing for Membership Inference in Fine-Tuned Language Modelscited by 3
  20. 2026Transformers perform adaptive partial poolingcited by 3
  21. 2026Internal Data Repetition Destroys Language Modelscited by 3
  22. 2024Multi-Epoch learning with Data Augmentation for Deep Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 2
  23. 2025Sub-Scaling Laws: On the Role of Data Density and Training Strategies in LLMscited by 2
  24. 2025Zero-Shot Performance Prediction for Probabilistic Scaling Lawscited by 2
  25. 2021Data-driven modeling of time-domain induced polarizationcited by 0
  26. 2024FQGA-single: Towards Fewer Training Epochs and Fewer Model Parameters for Image-to-Image Translation Taskscited by 0
  27. 2025A Comparison of Independent and Joint Fine-tuning Strategies for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 0
  28. 2026On the Evidentiary Limits of Membership Inference for Copyright Auditingcited by 0
  29. 2026Intra-Fairness Dynamics: The Bias Spillover Effect in Targeted LLM Alignmentcited by 0