Leader Stochastic Gradient Descent for Distributed Training of Deep Learning Models: Extension
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider distributed optimization under communication constraints for training deep learning models. We propose a new algorithm, whose parameter updates rely on two forces: a regular gradient step, and a corrective direction dictated by the currently best-performing worker (leader). Our method differs from the parameter-averaging scheme EASGD in a number of ways: (i) our objective formulation does not change the location of stationary points compared to the original optimization problem; (ii) we avoid convergence decelerations caused by pulling local workers descending to different local minima to each other (i.e. to the average of their parameters); (iii) our update by design breaks the curse of symmetry (the phenomenon of being trapped in poorly generalizing sub-optimal solutions in symmetric non-convex landscapes); and (iv) our approach is more communication efficient since it broadcasts only parameters of the leader rather than all workers. We provide theoretical analysis of the batch version of the proposed algorithm, which we call Leader Gradient Descent (LGD), and its stochastic variant (LSGD). Finally, we implement an asynchronous version of our algorithm and extend it to the multi-leader setting, where we form groups of workers, each represented by its own local leader (the best performer in a group), and update each worker with a corrective direction comprised of two attractive forces: one to the local, and one to the global leader (the best performer among all workers). The multi-leader setting is well-aligned with current hardware architecture, where local workers forming a group lie within a single computational node and different groups correspond to different nodes. For training convolutional neural networks, we empirically demonstrate that our approach compares favorably to state-of-the-art baselines. This work is a gentle extension of [2].
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024GRAWA: Gradient-based Weighted Averaging for Distributed Training of Deep Learning Modelscited by 4
- 2021Finite-Time Consensus Learning for Decentralized Optimization with Nonlinear Gossipingcited by 1
- 2024Adjacent Leader Decentralized Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 1
- 2024Adaptive Consensus Gradients Aggregation for Scaled Distributed Trainingcited by 1
- 2025Communication-Efficient Distributed Training for Collaborative Flat Optima Recovery in Deep Learningcited by 0
- 2025LSAM: Asynchronous Distributed Training with Landscape-Smoothed Sharpness-Aware Minimizationcited by 0
- 2026Understanding Head Geometry and Dynamics in Federated Regression through a Natural Solution Selection Rule: An Unconstrained Feature Model Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Understanding Head Geometry and Dynamics in Federated Regression through a Natural Solution Selection Rule: An Unconstrained Feature Model Analysis30 Sep 2026
- 2025LSAM: Asynchronous Distributed Training with Landscape-Smoothed Sharpness-Aware Minimization3 Sep 2025
- 2025Communication-Efficient Distributed Training for Collaborative Flat Optima Recovery in Deep Learning27 Jul 2025
- 2024Adaptive Consensus Gradients Aggregation for Scaled Distributed Training6 Nov 2024
- 2024Adjacent Leader Decentralized Stochastic Gradient Descent18 May 2024
- 2024GRAWA: Gradient-based Weighted Averaging for Distributed Training of Deep Learning Models7 Mar 2024
- 2021Finite-Time Consensus Learning for Decentralized Optimization with Nonlinear Gossiping4 Nov 2021