mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Extraction and Analysis of Clinically Important Follow-up Recommendations in a Large Radiology Dataset

arXiv 1905.05877 ↗First posted 14 May 2019cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Communication of follow-up recommendations when abnormalities are identified on imaging studies is prone to error. In this paper, we present a natural language processing approach based on deep learning to automatically identify clinically important recommendations in radiology reports. Our approach first identifies the recommendation sentences and then extracts reason, test, and time frame of the identified recommendations. To train our extraction models, we created a corpus of 567 radiology reports annotated for recommendation information. Our extraction models achieved 0.92 f-score for recommendation sentence, 0.65 f-score for reason, 0.73 f-score for test, and 0.84 f-score for time frame. We applied the extraction models to a set of over 3.3 million radiology reports and analyzed the adherence of follow-up recommendations.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.