Phase transition in PCA with missing data: Reduced signal-to-noise ratio, not sample size!
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How does missing data affect our ability to learn signal structures? It has been shown that learning signal structure in terms of principal components is dependent on the ratio of sample size and dimensionality and that a critical number of observations is needed before learning starts (Biehl and Mietzner, 1993). Here we generalize this analysis to include missing data. Probabilistic principal component analysis is regularly used for estimating signal structures in datasets with missing data. Our analytic result suggests that the effect of missing data is to effectively reduce signal-to-noise ratio rather than - as generally believed - to reduce sample size. The theory predicts a phase transition in the learning curves and this is indeed found both in simulation data and in real datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021The Shape of Learning Curves: a Reviewcited by 67
- 2023Learning Dynamics in Linear VAE: Posterior Collapse Threshold, Superfluous Latent Space Pitfalls, and Speedup with KL Annealingcited by 12
- 2023High-dimensional Asymptotics of VAEs: Threshold of Posterior Collapse and Dataset-Size Dependence of Rate-Distortion Curvecited by 5
- 2024Statistical Mechanics of Min-Max Problemscited by 1
- 2024Statistical Mechanics of Min-Max Problems9 Sep 2024
- 2023Learning Dynamics in Linear VAE: Posterior Collapse Threshold, Superfluous Latent Space Pitfalls, and Speedup with KL Annealing24 Oct 2023
- 2023High-dimensional Asymptotics of VAEs: Threshold of Posterior Collapse and Dataset-Size Dependence of Rate-Distortion Curve14 Sep 2023
- 2021The Shape of Learning Curves: a Review19 Mar 2021