mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AlphaClean: Automatic Generation of Data Cleaning Pipelines

arXiv 1904.11827 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2019cs.DBcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The analyst effort in data cleaning is gradually shifting away from the design of hand-written scripts to building and tuning complex pipelines of automated data cleaning libraries. Hyper-parameter tuning for data cleaning is very different than hyper-parameter tuning for machine learning since the pipeline components and objective functions have structure that tuning algorithms can exploit. This paper proposes a framework, called AlphaClean, that rethinks parameter tuning for data cleaning pipelines. AlphaClean provides users with a rich library to define data quality measures with weighted sums of SQL aggregate queries. AlphaClean applies generate-then-search framework where each pipelined cleaning operator contributes candidate transformations to a shared pool. Asynchronously, in separate threads, a search algorithm sequences them into cleaning pipelines that maximize the user-defined quality measures. This architecture allows AlphaClean to apply a number of optimizations including incremental evaluation of the quality measures and learning dynamic pruning rules to reduce the search space. Our experiments on real and synthetic benchmarks suggest that AlphaClean finds solutions of up-to 9x higher quality than naively applying state-of-the-art parameter tuning methods, is significantly more robust to straggling data cleaning methods and redundancy in the data cleaning library, and can incorporate state-of-the-art cleaning systems such as HoloClean as cleaning operators.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 4; 2023: 8; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 203
  2. 2022Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Surveycited by 135
  3. 2021How Much Automation Does a Data Scientist Want?cited by 20
  4. 2023README: Bridging Medical Jargon and Lay Understanding for Patient Education through Data-Centric NLPcited by 17
  5. 2022DC-Check: A Data-Centric AI checklist to guide the development of reliable machine learning systemscited by 14
  6. 2024Automated data processing and feature engineering for deep learning and big data applications: a surveycited by 14
  7. 2024Graph-based Confidence Calibration for Large Language Modelscited by 10
  8. 2023DiffPrep: Differentiable Data Preprocessing Pipeline Search for Learning over Tabular Datacited by 9
  9. 2023Data Cleaning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 9
  10. 2021A Unified Framework for Task-Driven Data Quality Managementcited by 7
  11. 2023Missing Values and Imputation in Healthcare Data: Can Interpretable Machine Learning Help?cited by 6
  12. 2023Auto-FP: An Experimental Study of Automated Feature Preprocessing for Tabular Datacited by 5
11 more
  1. 2024X Hacking: The Threat of Misguided AutoMLcited by 5
  2. 2022Exploring the Intersection between Neural Architecture Search and Continual Learningcited by 4
  3. 2025Empowering Tabular Data Preparation with Language Models: Why and How?cited by 4
  4. 2026DataEvolver: Automatic Data Preparation for Large Language Models through Multi-Level Self-Evolvingcited by 3
  5. 2023Adversarial Learning for Feature Shift Detection and Correctioncited by 2
  6. 2025Data and System Perspectives of Sustainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 2
  7. 2021Man versus Machine: AutoML and Human Experts' Role in Phishing Detectioncited by 0
  8. 2021From Strings to Data Science: a Practical Framework for Automated String Handlingcited by 0
  9. 2022A Survey on Semantics in Automated Data Sciencecited by 0
  10. 2023Enhancing Sentiment Analysis Results through Outlier Detection Optimizationcited by 0
  11. 2025Feature Shift Localization Networkcited by 0