mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Active Learning for Decision-Making from Imbalanced Observational Data

arXiv 1904.05268 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2019stat.ML cs.LGcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning can help personalized decision support by learning models to predict individual treatment effects (ITE). This work studies the reliability of prediction-based decision-making in a task of deciding which action a to take for a target unit after observing its covariates tildex and predicted outcomes hatp(tildey mid tildex, a). An example case is personalized medicine and the decision of which treatment to give to a patient. A common problem when learning these models from observational data is imbalance, that is, difference in treated/control covariate distributions, which is known to increase the upper bound of the expected ITE estimation error. We propose to assess the decision-making reliability by estimating the ITE model's Type S error rate, which is the probability of the model inferring the sign of the treatment effect wrong. Furthermore, we use the estimated reliability as a criterion for active learning, in order to collect new (possibly expensive) observations, instead of making a forced choice based on unreliable predictions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this decision-making aware active learning in two decision-making tasks: in simulated data with binary outcomes and in a medical dataset with synthetic and continuous treatment outcomes.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

16 papers.

Sort: