Quantum entanglement in physical and cognitive systems: a conceptual analysis and a general representation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We provide a general description of the phenomenon of entanglement in bipartite systems, as it manifests in micro and macro physical systems, as well as in human cognitive processes. We do so by observing that when genuine coincidence measurements are considered, the violation of the 'marginal laws', in addition to the Bell-CHSH inequality, is also to be expected. The situation can be described in the quantum formalism by considering the presence of entanglement not only at the level of the states, but also at the level of the measurements. However, at the "local'" level of a specific joint measurement, a description where entanglement is only incorporated in the state remains always possible, by adopting a fine-tuned tensor product representation. But contextual tensor product representations should only be considered when there are good reasons to describe the outcome-states as (non-entangled) product states. This will not in general be true, hence, the entangement resource will have to generally be allocated both in the states and in the measurements. In view of the numerous violations of the marginal laws observed in physics' laboratories, it remains unclear to date if entanglement in micro-physical systems is to be understood only as an 'entanglement of the states', or also as an 'entanglement of the measurements'. But even if measurements would also be entangled, the corresponding violation of the marginal laws (no-signaling conditions) would not for this imply that a superluminal communication would be possible.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022A Planck Radiation and Quantization Scheme for Human Cognition and Languagecited by 8
- 2021Are Words the Quanta of Human Language? Extending the Domain of Quantum Cognitioncited by 7
- 2025Identifying Quantum Structure in AI Language: Evidence for Evolutionary Convergence of Human and Artificial Cognitioncited by 3
- 2022Development of a Thermodynamics of Human Cognition and Human Culturecited by 2
- 2023Entanglement as a Method to Reduce Uncertaintycited by 1
- 2026Reply to comments arXiv:2512.07881 and arXiv:2601.06104 on quantum structure in human and AI-generated languagecited by 0
- 2026Reply to comments arXiv:2512.07881 and arXiv:2601.06104 on quantum structure in human and AI-generated language22 Sep 2026
- 2025Identifying Quantum Structure in AI Language: Evidence for Evolutionary Convergence of Human and Artificial Cognition21 Nov 2025
- 2023Entanglement as a Method to Reduce Uncertainty12 Feb 2023
- 2022Development of a Thermodynamics of Human Cognition and Human Culture24 Dec 2022
- 2022A Planck Radiation and Quantization Scheme for Human Cognition and Language10 Jan 2022
- 2021Are Words the Quanta of Human Language? Extending the Domain of Quantum Cognition10 Oct 2021