mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Convergence Analysis of Inexact Randomized Iterative Methods

arXiv 1903.07971 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2019math.OC cs.LG cs.NAcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper we present a convergence rate analysis of inexact variants of several randomized iterative methods. Among the methods studied are: stochastic gradient descent, stochastic Newton, stochastic proximal point and stochastic subspace ascent. A common feature of these methods is that in their update rule a certain sub-problem needs to be solved exactly. We relax this requirement by allowing for the sub-problem to be solved inexactly. In particular, we propose and analyze inexact randomized iterative methods for solving three closely related problems: a convex stochastic quadratic optimization problem, a best approximation problem and its dual, a concave quadratic maximization problem. We provide iteration complexity results under several assumptions on the inexactness error. Inexact variants of many popular and some more exotic methods, including randomized block Kaczmarz, randomized Gaussian Kaczmarz and randomized block coordinate descent, can be cast as special cases. Numerical experiments demonstrate the benefits of allowing inexactness.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 2.

8 papers.