Positively Scale-Invariant Flatness of ReLU Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It was empirically confirmed by Keskar et al.citeSharpMinima that flatter minima generalize better. However, for the popular ReLU network, sharp minimum can also generalize well citeSharpMinimacan. The conclusion demonstrates that the existing definitions of flatness fail to account for the complex geometry of ReLU neural networks because they can't cover the Positively Scale-Invariant (PSI) property of ReLU network. In this paper, we formalize the PSI causes problem of existing definitions of flatness and propose a new description of flatness - PSI-flatness. PSI-flatness is defined on the values of basis paths citeGSGD instead of weights. Values of basis paths have been shown to be the PSI-variables and can sufficiently represent the ReLU neural networks which ensure the PSI property of PSI-flatness. Then we study the relation between PSI-flatness and generalization theoretically and empirically. First, we formulate a generalization bound based on PSI-flatness which shows generalization error decreasing with the ratio between the largest basis path value and the smallest basis path value. That is to say, the minimum with balanced values of basis paths will more likely to be flatter and generalize better. Finally. we visualize the PSI-flatness of loss surface around two learned models which indicates the minimum with smaller PSI-flatness can indeed generalize better.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021ASAM: Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Scale-Invariant Learning of Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
- 2022Towards Efficient and Scalable Sharpness-Aware Minimizationcited by 129
- 2022Understanding Gradient Descent on Edge of Stability in Deep Learningcited by 126
- 2022Understanding the Generalization Benefit of Normalization Layers: Sharpness Reductioncited by 86
- 2022On the Symmetries of Deep Learning Models and their Internal Representationscited by 63
- 2021An Embedding of ReLU Networks and an Analysis of their Identifiabilitycited by 20
- 2022Local Identifiability of Deep ReLU Neural Networks: the Theorycited by 12
- 2025From Global to Local: A Scalable Benchmark for Local Posterior Samplingcited by 5
- 2026The Effect of Mini-Batch Noise on the Implicit Bias of Adamcited by 4
- 2023On the curvature of the loss landscapecited by 3
- 2024Helen: Optimizing CTR Prediction Models with Frequency-wise Hessian Eigenvalue Regularizationcited by 0
- 2026The Effect of Mini-Batch Noise on the Implicit Bias of Adam2 Feb 2026
- 2025From Global to Local: A Scalable Benchmark for Local Posterior Sampling29 Jul 2025
- 2024Helen: Optimizing CTR Prediction Models with Frequency-wise Hessian Eigenvalue Regularization23 Feb 2024
- 2023On the curvature of the loss landscape10 Jul 2023
- 2022Local Identifiability of Deep ReLU Neural Networks: the Theory15 Jun 2022
- 2022Understanding the Generalization Benefit of Normalization Layers: Sharpness Reduction14 Jun 2022
- 2022On the Symmetries of Deep Learning Models and their Internal Representations27 May 2022
- 2022Understanding Gradient Descent on Edge of Stability in Deep Learning19 May 2022
- 2022Towards Efficient and Scalable Sharpness-Aware Minimization5 Mar 2022
- 2021An Embedding of ReLU Networks and an Analysis of their Identifiability20 Jul 2021
- 2021ASAM: Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Scale-Invariant Learning of Deep Neural Networks23 Feb 2021