Variational Inference to Measure Model Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a novel approach for training deep neural networks in a Bayesian way. Classical, i.e. non-Bayesian, deep learning has two major drawbacks both originating from the fact that network parameters are considered to be deterministic. First, model uncertainty cannot be measured thus limiting the use of deep learning in many fields of application and second, training of deep neural networks is often hampered by overfitting. The proposed approach uses variational inference to approximate the intractable a posteriori distribution on basis of a normal prior. The variational density is designed in such a way that the a posteriori uncertainty of the network parameters is represented per network layer and depending on the estimated parameter expectation values. This way, only a few additional parameters need to be optimized compared to a non-Bayesian network. We apply this Bayesian approach to train and test the LeNet architecture on the MNIST dataset. Compared to classical deep learning, the test error is reduced by 15%. In addition, the trained model contains information about the parameter uncertainty in each layer. We show that this information can be used to calculate credible intervals for the prediction and to optimize the network architecture for a given training data set.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
12 papers.
- 2024A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Open Research Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 115
- 2023A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Deep Learningcited by 78
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Evidential Deep Learning and Its Applicationscited by 25
- 2022Theoretical characterization of uncertainty in high-dimensional linear classificationcited by 18
- 2024Looks Too Good To Be True: An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Hallucinations in Generative Restoration Modelscited by 12
- 2022What's Behind the Mask: Estimating Uncertainty in Image-to-Image Problemscited by 5
- 2023Variational Inference for Bayesian Neural Networks under Model and Parameter Uncertaintycited by 5
- 2021Bayesian Active Meta-Learning for Few Pilot Demodulation and Equalizationcited by 2
- 2023Bivariate DeepKriging for Large-scale Spatial Interpolation of Wind Fieldscited by 2
- 2025SurvUnc: A Meta-Model Based Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Survival Analysiscited by 2
- 2021Identifying Incorrect Classifications with Balanced Uncertaintycited by 1
- 2022UNBUS: Uncertainty-aware Deep Botnet Detection System in Presence of Perturbed Samplescited by 1
- 2025SurvUnc: A Meta-Model Based Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Survival Analysis20 May 2025
- 2024A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Open Research Challenges, and Future Directions7 Dec 2024
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Evidential Deep Learning and Its Applications7 Sep 2024
- 2024Looks Too Good To Be True: An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Hallucinations in Generative Restoration Models26 May 2024
- 2023Bivariate DeepKriging for Large-scale Spatial Interpolation of Wind Fields16 Jul 2023
- 2023Variational Inference for Bayesian Neural Networks under Model and Parameter Uncertainty1 May 2023
- 2023A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Deep Learning26 Feb 2023
- 2022What's Behind the Mask: Estimating Uncertainty in Image-to-Image Problems28 Nov 2022
- 2022UNBUS: Uncertainty-aware Deep Botnet Detection System in Presence of Perturbed Samples18 Apr 2022
- 2022Theoretical characterization of uncertainty in high-dimensional linear classification7 Feb 2022
- 2021Identifying Incorrect Classifications with Balanced Uncertainty15 Oct 2021
- 2021Bayesian Active Meta-Learning for Few Pilot Demodulation and Equalization2 Aug 2021