mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Similarity Learning Networks for Animal Individual Re-Identification -- Beyond the Capabilities of a Human Observer

arXiv 1902.09324 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2019cs.CVcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning has become the standard methodology to approach computer vision tasks when large amounts of labeled data are available. One area where traditional deep learning approaches fail to perform is one-shot learning tasks where a model must correctly classify a new category after seeing only one example. One such domain is animal re-identification, an application of computer vision which can be used globally as a method to automate species population estimates from camera trap images. Our work demonstrates both the application of similarity comparison networks to animal re-identification, as well as the capabilities of deep convolutional neural networks to generalize across domains. Few studies have considered animal re-identification methods across species. Here, we compare two similarity comparison methodologies: Siamese and Triplet-Loss, based on the AlexNet, VGG-19, DenseNet201, MobileNetV2, and InceptionV3 architectures considering mean average precision (mAP)@1 and mAP@5. We consider five data sets corresponding to five different species: humans, chimpanzees, humpback whales, fruit flies, and Siberian tigers, each with their own unique set of challenges. We demonstrate that Triplet Loss outperformed its Siamese counterpart for all species. Without any species-specific modifications, our results demonstrate that similarity comparison networks can reach a performance level beyond that of humans for the task of animal re-identification. The ability for researchers to re-identify an animal individual upon re-encounter is fundamental for addressing a broad range of questions in the study of population dynamics and community/behavioural ecology. Our expectation is that similarity comparison networks are the beginning of a major trend that could stand to revolutionize animal re-identification from camera trap data.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 6; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Perspectives on individual animal identification from biology and computer visioncited by 31
  2. 2022SealID: Saimaa ringed seal re-identification datasetcited by 22
  3. 2021ElephantBook: A Semi-Automated Human-in-the-Loop System for Elephant Re-Identificationcited by 8
  4. 2021The Animal ID Problem: Continual Curationcited by 5
  5. 2022Label a Herd in Minutes: Individual Holstein-Friesian Cattle Identificationcited by 5
  6. 2022NORPPA: NOvel Ringed seal re-identification by Pelage Pattern Aggregationcited by 5
  7. 2021EDEN: Deep Feature Distribution Pooling for Saimaa Ringed Seals Pattern Matchingcited by 4
  8. 2022MOTCOM: The Multi-Object Tracking Dataset Complexity Metriccited by 2
  9. 2022Towards Individual Grevy's Zebra Identification via Deep 3D Fitting and Metric Learningcited by 1
  10. 2023A contrastive learning approach for individual re-identification in a wild fish populationcited by 1
  11. 2023Deep Visual-Genetic Biometrics for Taxonomic Classification of Rare Speciescited by 1
  12. 2024Recurrence over Video Frames (RoVF) for the Re-identification of Meerkatscited by 1
6 more
  1. 2021Visual Microfossil Identification via Deep Metric Learningcited by 0
  2. 2022An Image Processing Pipeline for Camera Trap Time-Lapse Recordingscited by 0
  3. 2024Systematic Literature Review of Vision-Based Approaches to Outdoor Livestock Monitoring with Lessons from Wildlife Studiescited by 0
  4. 2025Efficient Mixture of Geographical Species for On Device Wildlife Monitoringcited by 0
  5. 2026From Visual to Multimodal: Systematic Ablation of Encoders and Fusion Strategies in Animal Identificationcited by 0
  6. 2026ID-Sim: An Identity-Focused Similarity Metriccited by 0