Are Few-Shot Learning Benchmarks too Simple ? Solving them without Task Supervision at Test-Time
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We show that several popular few-shot learning benchmarks can be solved with varying degrees of success without using support set Labels at Test-time (LT). To this end, we introduce a new baseline called Centroid Networks, a modification of Prototypical Networks in which the support set labels are hidden from the method at test-time and have to be recovered through clustering. A benchmark that can be solved perfectly without LT does not require proper task adaptation and is therefore inadequate for evaluating few-shot methods. In practice, most benchmarks cannot be solved perfectly without LT, but running our baseline on any new combinations of architectures and datasets gives insights on the baseline performance to be expected from leveraging a good representation, before any adaptation to the test-time labels.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Learning from Few Examples: A Summary of Approaches to Few-Shot Learningcited by 86
- 2024A Survey of Few-Shot Learning for Biomedical Time Seriescited by 7
- 2021Online Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations and Categoriescited by 4
- 2022Few-Example Clustering via Contrastive Learningcited by 0
- 2024A Survey of Few-Shot Learning for Biomedical Time Series3 May 2024
- 2022Few-Example Clustering via Contrastive Learning8 Jul 2022
- 2022Learning from Few Examples: A Summary of Approaches to Few-Shot Learning7 Mar 2022
- 2021Online Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations and Categories13 Sep 2021