mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Are Few-Shot Learning Benchmarks too Simple ? Solving them without Task Supervision at Test-Time

arXiv 1902.08605 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show that several popular few-shot learning benchmarks can be solved with varying degrees of success without using support set Labels at Test-time (LT). To this end, we introduce a new baseline called Centroid Networks, a modification of Prototypical Networks in which the support set labels are hidden from the method at test-time and have to be recovered through clustering. A benchmark that can be solved perfectly without LT does not require proper task adaptation and is therefore inadequate for evaluating few-shot methods. In practice, most benchmarks cannot be solved perfectly without LT, but running our baseline on any new combinations of architectures and datasets gives insights on the baseline performance to be expected from leveraging a good representation, before any adaptation to the test-time labels.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

4 papers.