mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Many-to-Many Mapping Between the Concordance Correlation Coefficient and the Mean Square Error

arXiv 1902.05180 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2019cs.LG math.ST stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We derive the mapping between two of the most pervasive utility functions, the mean square error (MSE) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC, ρc). Despite its drawbacks, MSE is one of the most popular performance metrics (and a loss function); along with lately ρc in many of the sequence prediction challenges. Despite the ever-growing simultaneous usage, e.g., inter-rater agreement, assay validation, a mapping between the two metrics is missing, till date. While minimisation of Lp norm of the errors or of its positive powers (e.g., MSE) is aimed at ρc maximisation, we reason the often-witnessed ineffectiveness of this popular loss function with graphical illustrations. The discovered formula uncovers not only the counterintuitive revelation that `MSE1<MSE2' does not imply `ρc1>ρc2', but also provides the precise range for the ρc metric for a given MSE. We discover the conditions for ρc optimisation for a given MSE; and as a logical next step, for a given set of errors. We generalise and discover the conditions for any given Lp norm, for an even p. We present newly discovered, albeit apparent, mathematical paradoxes. The study inspires and anticipates a growing use of ρc-inspired loss functions e.g., left|fracMSEσXYright|, replacing the traditional Lp-norm loss functions in multivariate regressions.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.