The Use of Unlabeled Data versus Labeled Data for Stopping Active Learning for Text Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Annotation of training data is the major bottleneck in the creation of text classification systems. Active learning is a commonly used technique to reduce the amount of training data one needs to label. A crucial aspect of active learning is determining when to stop labeling data. Three potential sources for informing when to stop active learning are an additional labeled set of data, an unlabeled set of data, and the training data that is labeled during the process of active learning. To date, no one has compared and contrasted the advantages and disadvantages of stopping methods based on these three information sources. We find that stopping methods that use unlabeled data are more effective than methods that use labeled data.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processingcited by 40
- 2021Hitting the Target: Stopping Active Learning at the Cost-Based Optimumcited by 9
- 2022Impact of Stop Sets on Stopping Active Learning for Text Classificationcited by 2
- 2025Active Learning Methods for Efficient Data Utilization and Model Performance Enhancementcited by 0
- 2025Active Learning Methods for Efficient Data Utilization and Model Performance Enhancement21 Apr 2025
- 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processing18 Oct 2022
- 2022Impact of Stop Sets on Stopping Active Learning for Text Classification8 Jan 2022
- 2021Hitting the Target: Stopping Active Learning at the Cost-Based Optimum7 Oct 2021