mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep-Learning Inversion of Seismic Data

arXiv 1901.07733 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2019cs.CV cs.AIcited by 30

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a new method to tackle the mapping challenge from time-series data to spatial image in the field of seismic exploration, i.e., reconstructing the velocity model directly from seismic data by deep neural networks (DNNs). The conventional way of addressing this ill-posed inversion problem is through iterative algorithms, which suffer from poor nonlinear mapping and strong nonuniqueness. Other attempts may either import human intervention errors or underuse seismic data. The challenge for DNNs mainly lies in the weak spatial correspondence, the uncertain reflection-reception relationship between seismic data and velocity model, as well as the time-varying property of seismic data. To tackle these challenges, we propose end-to-end seismic inversion networks (SeisInvNets) with novel components to make the best use of all seismic data. Specifically, we start with every seismic trace and enhance it with its neighborhood information, its observation setup, and the global context of its corresponding seismic profile. From the enhanced seismic traces, the spatially aligned feature maps can be learned and further concatenated to reconstruct a velocity model. In general, we let every seismic trace contribute to the reconstruction of the whole velocity model by finding spatial correspondence. The proposed SeisInvNet consistently produces improvements over the baselines and achieves promising performance on our synthesized and proposed SeisInv data set according to various evaluation metrics. The inversion results are more consistent with the target from the aspects of velocity values, subsurface structures, and geological interfaces. Moreover, the mechanism and the generalization of the proposed method are discussed and verified. Nevertheless, the generalization of deep-learning-based inversion methods on real data is still challenging and considering physics may be one potential solution.

Key facts. Cited by 30 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 7; 2023: 5; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

30 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Unsupervised Learning of Full-Waveform Inversion: Connecting CNN and Partial Differential Equation in a Loopcited by 29
  2. 2023A prior regularized full waveform inversion using generative diffusion modelscited by 29
  3. 2023Deep Learning in Deterministic Computational Mechanicscited by 21
  4. 2024Controllable seismic velocity synthesis using generative diffusion modelscited by 13
  5. 2021InversionNet3D: Efficient and Scalable Learning for 3D Full Waveform Inversioncited by 12
  6. 2021Quantitative reconstruction of defects in multi-layered bonded composites using fully convolutional network-based ultrasonic inversioncited by 5
  7. 2025Physics-informed waveform inversion using pretrained wavefield neural operatorscited by 5
  8. 2023Transfer Learning Enhanced Full Waveform Inversioncited by 4
  9. 2024Cross-Domain Foundation Model Adaptation: Pioneering Computer Vision Models for Geophysical Data Analysiscited by 4
  10. 2022Inversion of Time-Lapse Surface Gravity Data for Detection of 3D CO2 Plumes via Deep Learningcited by 3
  11. 2022S2S-WTV: Seismic Data Noise Attenuation Using Weighted Total Variation Regularized Self-Supervised Learningcited by 3
  12. 2025A generative foundation model for an all-in-one seismic processing frameworkcited by 3
18 more
  1. 2022A Frequency-Velocity CNN for Developing Near-Surface 2D Vs Images from Linear-Array, Active-Source Wavefield Measurementscited by 2
  2. 2022Using explainability to design physics-aware CNNs for solving subsurface inverse problemscited by 2
  3. 2021Hybrid and Automated Machine Learning Approaches for Oil Fields Development: the Case Study of Volve Field, North Seacited by 1
  4. 2022Automatic Velocity Picking Using a Multi-Information Fusion Deep Semantic Segmentation Networkcited by 1
  5. 2023Joint inversion of Time-Lapse Surface Gravity and Seismic Data for Monitoring of 3D CO2 Plumes via Deep Learningcited by 1
  6. 2024Integrating Physics of the Problem into Data-Driven Methods to Enhance Elastic Full-Waveform Inversion with Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 1
  7. 2025DispFormer: A Pretrained Transformer Incorporating Physical Constraints for Dispersion Curve Inversioncited by 1
  8. 2021On the Robustness and Generalization of Deep Learning Driven Full Waveform Inversioncited by 0
  9. 2022Complete identification of complex salt geometries from inaccurate migrated subsurface offset gathers using deep learningcited by 0
  10. 2022CONSS: Contrastive Learning Approach for Semi-Supervised Seismic Facies Classificationcited by 0
  11. 2023SVInvNet: A Densely Connected Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Seismic Velocity Inversioncited by 0
  12. 2024Physics-guided Full Waveform Inversion using Encoder-Solver Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 0
  13. 2025Synergizing Deep Learning and Full-Waveform Inversion: Bridging Data-Driven and Theory-Guided Approaches for Enhanced Seismic Imagingcited by 0
  14. 2026Improving Full Waveform Inversion in Large Model Eracited by 0
  15. 2026High-Fidelity Compression of Seismic Velocity Models via SIREN Auto-Decoderscited by 0
  16. 2026SIGMA: A Physics-Based Benchmark for Gas Chimney Understanding in Seismic Imagescited by 0
  17. 2026Accelerating physics-informed neural networks for full waveform inversion using a hybrid quantum-classical finite-basis architecturecited by 0
  18. 2026ROMNet: a hybrid reduced order modeling and machine learning approach to waveform inversioncited by 0