mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Solution Refinement at Regular Points of Conic Problems

arXiv 1811.02157 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2018math.OCcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most numerical methods for conic problems use the homogenous primal-dual embedding, which yields a primal-dual solution or a certificate establishing primal or dual infeasibility. Following Patrinos (and others, 2018), we express the embedding as the problem of finding a zero of a mapping containing a skew-symmetric linear function and projections onto cones and their duals. We focus on the special case when this mapping is regular, i.e., differentiable with nonsingular derivative matrix, at a solution point. While this is not always the case, it is a very common occurrence in practice. We propose a simple method that uses LSQR, a variant of conjugate gradients for least squares problems, and the derivative of the residual mapping to refine an approximate solution, i.e., to increase its accuracy. LSQR is a matrix-free method, i.e., requires only the evaluation of the derivative mapping and its adjoint, and so avoids forming or storing large matrices, which makes it efficient even for cone problems in which the data matrices are given and dense, and also allows the method to extend to cone programs in which the data are given as abstract linear operators. Numerical examples show that the method almost always improves an approximate solution of a conic program, and often dramatically, at a computational cost that is typically small compared to the cost of obtaining the original approximate solution. For completeness we describe methods for computing the derivative of the projection onto the cones commonly used in practice: nonnegative, second-order, semidefinite, and exponential cones. The paper is accompanied by an open source implementation.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

21 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021DC3: A learning method for optimization with hard constraintscited by 181
  2. 2023Decision-Focused Learning: Foundations, State of the Art, Benchmark and Future Opportunitiescited by 129
  3. 2022Tutorial on amortized optimizationcited by 83
  4. 2021Nonsmooth Implicit Differentiation for Machine Learning and Optimizationcited by 43
  5. 2023Learning to Warm-Start Fixed-Point Optimization Algorithmscited by 32
  6. 2021Efficient differentiable quadratic programming layers: an ADMM approachcited by 19
  7. 2025Pinet: Optimizing hard-constrained neural networks with orthogonal projection layerscited by 17
  8. 2022Flexible Differentiable Optimization via Model Transformationscited by 16
  9. 2023Backpropagation of Unrolled Solvers with Folded Optimizationcited by 13
  10. 2021Neural Fixed-Point Acceleration for Convex Optimizationcited by 10
  11. 2024Differentiable Distributionally Robust Optimization Layerscited by 8
  12. 2021Diff-Explainer: Differentiable Convex Optimization for Explainable Multi-hop Inferencecited by 7
9 more
  1. 2024LPGD: A General Framework for Backpropagation through Embedded Optimization Layerscited by 6
  2. 2023Implicit Bilevel Optimization: Differentiating through Bilevel Optimization Programmingcited by 2
  3. 2022Gradient boosting for convex cone predict and optimize problemscited by 1
  4. 2023Analyzing and Enhancing the Backward-Pass Convergence of Unrolled Optimizationcited by 1
  5. 2026Learning to Optimize by Differentiable Programmingcited by 1
  6. 2025Decision-Focused Learning for Complex System Identification: HVAC Management System Applicationcited by 0
  7. 2025Learning to Solve Constrained Bilevel Control Co-Design Problemscited by 0
  8. 2025Distributionally Robust Control with End-to-End Statistically Guaranteed Metric Learningcited by 0
  9. 2026End-to-End Fairness Optimization with Fair Decision-Focused Learningcited by 0