Machine Learning Suites for Online Toxicity Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To identify and classify toxic online commentary, the modern tools of data science transform raw text into key features from which either thresholding or learning algorithms can make predictions for monitoring offensive conversations. We systematically evaluate 62 classifiers representing 19 major algorithmic families against features extracted from the Jigsaw dataset of Wikipedia comments. We compare the classifiers based on statistically significant differences in accuracy and relative execution time. Among these classifiers for identifying toxic comments, tree-based algorithms provide the most transparently explainable rules and rank-order the predictive contribution of each feature. Among 28 features of syntax, sentiment, emotion and outlier word dictionaries, a simple bad word list proves most predictive of offensive commentary.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
12 papers.
- 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 401
- 2022COLD: A Benchmark for Chinese Offensive Language Detectioncited by 76
- 2023Automated Ableism: An Exploration of Explicit Disability Biases in Sentiment and Toxicity Analysis Modelscited by 20
- 2021Identification of Bias Against People with Disabilities in Sentiment Analysis and Toxicity Detection Modelscited by 13
- 2021Countering Online Hate Speech: An NLP Perspectivecited by 12
- 2023Adversarial Fine-Tuning of Language Models: An Iterative Optimisation Approach for the Generation and Detection of Problematic Contentcited by 7
- 2021Offensive Language Identification in Low-resourced Code-mixed Dravidian languages using Pseudo-labelingcited by 6
- 2021BERT-Beta: A Proactive Probabilistic Approach to Text Moderationcited by 6
- 2021UoB at SemEval-2021 Task 5: Extending Pre-Trained Language Models to Include Task and Domain-Specific Information for Toxic Span Predictioncited by 1
- 2022Effect of Toxic Review Content on Overall Product Sentimentcited by 0
- 2023Learning to love diligent trolls: Accounting for rater effects in the dialogue safety taskcited by 0
- 2025Soft Weighted Machine Unlearningcited by 0
- 2025Soft Weighted Machine Unlearning24 May 2025
- 2023Learning to love diligent trolls: Accounting for rater effects in the dialogue safety task30 Oct 2023
- 2023Adversarial Fine-Tuning of Language Models: An Iterative Optimisation Approach for the Generation and Detection of Problematic Content26 Aug 2023
- 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignment10 Aug 2023
- 2023Automated Ableism: An Exploration of Explicit Disability Biases in Sentiment and Toxicity Analysis Models18 Jul 2023
- 2022COLD: A Benchmark for Chinese Offensive Language Detection16 Jan 2022
- 2022Effect of Toxic Review Content on Overall Product Sentiment8 Jan 2022
- 2021Identification of Bias Against People with Disabilities in Sentiment Analysis and Toxicity Detection Models25 Nov 2021
- 2021UoB at SemEval-2021 Task 5: Extending Pre-Trained Language Models to Include Task and Domain-Specific Information for Toxic Span Prediction7 Oct 2021
- 2021BERT-Beta: A Proactive Probabilistic Approach to Text Moderation18 Sep 2021
- 2021Countering Online Hate Speech: An NLP Perspective7 Sep 2021
- 2021Offensive Language Identification in Low-resourced Code-mixed Dravidian languages using Pseudo-labeling27 Aug 2021