Temporal Cliques Admit Sparse Spanners
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Let G=(V,E) be an undirected graph on n vertices and λ:E→ 2^mathbbN a mapping that assigns to every edge a non-empty set of integer labels (times). Such a graph is em temporally connected if a path exists with non-decreasing times from every vertex to every other vertex. In a seminal paper, Kempe, Kleinberg, and Kumar citeKKK02 asked whether, given such a temporal graph, a em sparse subset of edges always exists whose labels suffice to preserve temporal connectivity -- a em temporal spanner. Axiotis and Fotakis citeAF16 answered negatively by exhibiting a family of Theta(n2)-dense temporal graphs which admit no temporal spanner of density o(n2). In this paper, we give the first positive answer as to the existence of o(n2)-sparse spanners in a dense class of temporal graphs, by showing (constructively) that if G is a complete graph, then one can always find a temporal spanner of density O(n log n).
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.
- 2023Temporal Network Creation Gamescited by 0
- 2023Temporal Network Creation Games12 May 2023