mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Temporal Cliques Admit Sparse Spanners

arXiv 1810.00104 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2018cs.DM cs.DC cs.NIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Let G=(V,E) be an undirected graph on n vertices and λ:E→ 2^mathbbN a mapping that assigns to every edge a non-empty set of integer labels (times). Such a graph is em temporally connected if a path exists with non-decreasing times from every vertex to every other vertex. In a seminal paper, Kempe, Kleinberg, and Kumar citeKKK02 asked whether, given such a temporal graph, a em sparse subset of edges always exists whose labels suffice to preserve temporal connectivity -- a em temporal spanner. Axiotis and Fotakis citeAF16 answered negatively by exhibiting a family of Theta(n2)-dense temporal graphs which admit no temporal spanner of density o(n2). In this paper, we give the first positive answer as to the existence of o(n2)-sparse spanners in a dense class of temporal graphs, by showing (constructively) that if G is a complete graph, then one can always find a temporal spanner of density O(n log n).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.