Safe Reinforcement Learning via Probabilistic Shields
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper targets the efficient construction of a safety shield for decision making in scenarios that incorporate uncertainty. Markov decision processes (MDPs) are prominent models to capture such planning problems. Reinforcement learning (RL) is a machine learning technique to determine near-optimal policies in MDPs that may be unknown prior to exploring the model. However, during exploration, RL is prone to induce behavior that is undesirable or not allowed in safety- or mission-critical contexts. We introduce the concept of a probabilistic shield that enables decision-making to adhere to safety constraints with high probability. In a separation of concerns, we employ formal verification to efficiently compute the probabilities of critical decisions within a safety-relevant fragment of the MDP. We use these results to realize a shield that is applied to an RL algorithm which then optimizes the actual performance objective. We discuss tradeoffs between sufficient progress in exploration of the environment and ensuring safety. In our experiments, we demonstrate on the arcade game PAC-MAN and on a case study involving service robots that the learning efficiency increases as the learning needs orders of magnitude fewer episodes.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
- 2021Learning Barrier Certificates: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning with Zero Training-time Violationscited by 36
- 2021Model-Free Learning of Safe yet Effective Controllerscited by 5
- 2022PAC Statistical Model Checking of Mean Payoff in Discrete- and Continuous-Time MDPcited by 4
- 2025Conformal Safety Shielding for Imperfect-Perception Agentscited by 3
- 2026Neuro-Symbolic Injection of LTLf Constraints in Autoregressive Reinforcement Learning Policiescited by 0
- 2026Trust Is Not a Score: Runtime Assurance Contracts for High-Risk AI Agentscited by 0
- 2026Trust Is Not a Score: Runtime Assurance Contracts for High-Risk AI Agents30 Sep 2026
- 2026Neuro-Symbolic Injection of LTLf Constraints in Autoregressive Reinforcement Learning Policies6 Jun 2026
- 2025Conformal Safety Shielding for Imperfect-Perception Agents12 Jun 2025
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback27 Jul 2023
- 2022PAC Statistical Model Checking of Mean Payoff in Discrete- and Continuous-Time MDP3 Jun 2022
- 2021Learning Barrier Certificates: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning with Zero Training-time Violations4 Aug 2021
- 2021Model-Free Learning of Safe yet Effective Controllers26 Mar 2021