Efficient Full-Matrix Adaptive Regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adaptive regularization methods pre-multiply a descent direction by a preconditioning matrix. Due to the large number of parameters of machine learning problems, full-matrix preconditioning methods are prohibitively expensive. We show how to modify full-matrix adaptive regularization in order to make it practical and effective. We also provide a novel theoretical analysis for adaptive regularization in non-convex optimization settings. The core of our algorithm, termed GGT, consists of the efficient computation of the inverse square root of a low-rank matrix. Our preliminary experiments show improved iteration-wise convergence rates across synthetic tasks and standard deep learning benchmarks, and that the more carefully-preconditioned steps sometimes lead to a better solution.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Gradient Alignment in Physics-informed Neural Networks: A Second-Order Optimization Perspectivecited by 56
- 2021MetaGrad: Adaptation using Multiple Learning Rates in Online Learningcited by 26
- 2023Low-rank extended Kalman filtering for online learning of neural networks from streaming datacited by 23
- 2022Learning to Accelerate by the Methods of Step-size Planningcited by 0
- 2025Staying Alive: Online Neural Network Maintenance and Systemic Driftcited by 0
- 2025Staying Alive: Online Neural Network Maintenance and Systemic Drift22 Mar 2025
- 2025Gradient Alignment in Physics-informed Neural Networks: A Second-Order Optimization Perspective2 Feb 2025
- 2023Low-rank extended Kalman filtering for online learning of neural networks from streaming data31 May 2023
- 2022Learning to Accelerate by the Methods of Step-size Planning1 Apr 2022
- 2021MetaGrad: Adaptation using Multiple Learning Rates in Online Learning12 Feb 2021