Boosting Handwriting Text Recognition in Small Databases with Transfer Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper we deal with the offline handwriting text recognition (HTR) problem with reduced training datasets. Recent HTR solutions based on artificial neural networks exhibit remarkable solutions in referenced databases. These deep learning neural networks are composed of both convolutional (CNN) and long short-term memory recurrent units (LSTM). In addition, connectionist temporal classification (CTC) is the key to avoid segmentation at character level, greatly facilitating the labeling task. One of the main drawbacks of the CNNLSTM-CTC (CLC) solutions is that they need a considerable part of the text to be transcribed for every type of calligraphy, typically in the order of a few thousands of lines. Furthermore, in some scenarios the text to transcribe is not that long, e.g. in the Washington database. The CLC typically overfits for this reduced number of training samples. Our proposal is based on the transfer learning (TL) from the parameters learned with a bigger database. We first investigate, for a reduced and fixed number of training samples, 350 lines, how the learning from a large database, the IAM, can be transferred to the learning of the CLC of a reduced database, Washington. We focus on which layers of the network could be not re-trained. We conclude that the best solution is to re-train the whole CLC parameters initialized to the values obtained after the training of the CLC from the larger database. We also investigate results when the training size is further reduced. The differences in the CER are more remarkable when training with just 350 lines, a CER of 3.3% is achieved with TL while we have a CER of 18.2% when training from scratch. As a byproduct, the learning times are quite reduced. Similar good results are obtained from the Parzival database when trained with this reduced number of lines and this new approach.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023How to Choose Pretrained Handwriting Recognition Models for Single Writer Fine-Tuningcited by 13
- 2024On the Generalization of Handwritten Text Recognition Modelscited by 10
- 2021Lacuna Reconstruction: Self-supervised Pre-training for Low-Resource Historical Document Transcriptioncited by 3
- 2025Quo Vadis Handwritten Text Generation for Handwritten Text Recognition?cited by 2
- 2022Improving Amharic Handwritten Word Recognition Using Auxiliary Taskcited by 1
- 2023Text recognition on images using pre-trained CNNcited by 1
- 2021Mythological Medical Machine Learning: Boosting the Performance of a Deep Learning Medical Data Classifier Using Realistic Physiological Modelscited by 0
- 2026Zero-Shot Synthetic-to-Real Handwritten Text Recognition via Task Analogiescited by 0
- 2026Zero-Shot Synthetic-to-Real Handwritten Text Recognition via Task Analogies8 Apr 2026
- 2025Quo Vadis Handwritten Text Generation for Handwritten Text Recognition?13 Aug 2025
- 2024On the Generalization of Handwritten Text Recognition Models26 Nov 2024
- 2023How to Choose Pretrained Handwriting Recognition Models for Single Writer Fine-Tuning4 May 2023
- 2023Text recognition on images using pre-trained CNN10 Feb 2023
- 2022Improving Amharic Handwritten Word Recognition Using Auxiliary Task25 Feb 2022
- 2021Mythological Medical Machine Learning: Boosting the Performance of a Deep Learning Medical Data Classifier Using Realistic Physiological Models28 Dec 2021
- 2021Lacuna Reconstruction: Self-supervised Pre-training for Low-Resource Historical Document Transcription16 Dec 2021