mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimizing the Trade-off between Single-Stage and Two-Stage Object Detectors using Image Difficulty Prediction

arXiv 1803.08707 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2018cs.CVcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There are mainly two types of state-of-the-art object detectors. On one hand, we have two-stage detectors, such as Faster R-CNN (Region-based Convolutional Neural Networks) or Mask R-CNN, that (i) use a Region Proposal Network to generate regions of interests in the first stage and (ii) send the region proposals down the pipeline for object classification and bounding-box regression. Such models reach the highest accuracy rates, but are typically slower. On the other hand, we have single-stage detectors, such as YOLO (You Only Look Once) and SSD (Singe Shot MultiBox Detector), that treat object detection as a simple regression problem by taking an input image and learning the class probabilities and bounding box coordinates. Such models reach lower accuracy rates, but are much faster than two-stage object detectors. In this paper, we propose to use an image difficulty predictor to achieve an optimal trade-off between accuracy and speed in object detection. The image difficulty predictor is applied on the test images to split them into easy versus hard images. Once separated, the easy images are sent to the faster single-stage detector, while the hard images are sent to the more accurate two-stage detector. Our experiments on PASCAL VOC 2007 show that using image difficulty compares favorably to a random split of the images. Our method is flexible, in that it allows to choose a desired threshold for splitting the images into easy versus hard.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Comparing YOLOv8 and Mask R-CNN for instance segmentation in complex orchard environmentscited by 14
  2. 2021Video-based fully automatic assessment of open surgery suturing skillscited by 12
  3. 2024A Lightweight Measure of Classification Difficulty from Application Dataset Characteristicscited by 4
  4. 2021Towards practical object detection for weed spraying in precision agriculturecited by 3
  5. 2025Open-Vocabulary Object Detection in UAV Imagery: A Review and Future Perspectivescited by 3
  6. 2021Deep adversarial attack on target detection systemscited by 2
  7. 2022LPYOLO: Low Precision YOLO for Face Detection on FPGAcited by 1
  8. 2022Sketch2FullStack: Generating Skeleton Code of Full Stack Website and Application from Sketch using Deep Learning and Computer Visioncited by 1
  9. 2024MLMT-CNN for Object Detection and Segmentation in Multi-layer and Multi-spectral Imagescited by 1
  10. 2022SHOP: A Deep Learning Based Pipeline for near Real-Time Detection of Small Handheld Objects Present in Blurry Videocited by 0
  11. 2022Critical Evaluation of LOCO dataset with Machine Learningcited by 0
  12. 2023Development, Optimization, and Deployment of Thermal Forward Vision Systems for Advance Vehicular Applications on Edge Devicescited by 0
6 more
  1. 2023Augmenting Zero-Shot Detection Training with Image Labelscited by 0
  2. 2024Voice-Assisted Real-Time Traffic Sign Recognition System Using Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 0
  3. 2024AttentNet: Fully Convolutional 3D Attention for Lung Nodule Detectioncited by 0
  4. 2025Improving Object Detection Performance through YOLOv8: A Comprehensive Training and Evaluation Studycited by 0
  5. 2026Efficient Neural Network Model Selection for Few-Class Application Datasetscited by 0
  6. 2026Latent Commonality Expectation-Maximisation for Box-supervised Tree Crown Instance Segmentationcited by 0