Extracting Action Sequences from Texts Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Extracting action sequences from natural language texts is challenging, as it requires commonsense inferences based on world knowledge. Although there has been work on extracting action scripts, instructions, navigation actions, etc., they require that either the set of candidate actions be provided in advance, or that action descriptions are restricted to a specific form, e.g., description templates. In this paper, we aim to extract action sequences from texts in free natural language, i.e., without any restricted templates, provided the candidate set of actions is unknown. We propose to extract action sequences from texts based on the deep reinforcement learning framework. Specifically, we view "selecting" or "eliminating" words from texts as "actions", and the texts associated with actions as "states". We then build Q-networks to learn the policy of extracting actions and extract plans from the labeled texts. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on several datasets with comparison to state-of-the-art approaches, including online experiments interacting with humans.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
12 papers.
- 2023Translating Natural Language to Planning Goals with Large-Language Modelscited by 133
- 2025LLMs as Planning Formalizers: A Survey for Leveraging Large Language Models to Construct Automated Planning Modelscited by 38
- 2021GPT3-to-plan: Extracting plans from text using GPT-3cited by 26
- 2021Classical Planning in Deep Latent Spacecited by 22
- 2022Leveraging Approximate Symbolic Models for Reinforcement Learning via Skill Diversitycited by 22
- 2023Planning with Logical Graph-based Language Model for Instruction Generationcited by 4
- 2022Integrating AI Planning with Natural Language Processing: A Combination of Explicit and Tacit Knowledgecited by 3
- 2023Automated Action Model Acquisition from Narrative Textscited by 3
- 2022Text-Based Action-Model Acquisition for Planningcited by 2
- 2023Learning to Play Chess from Textbooks (LEAP): a Corpus for Evaluating Chess Moves based on Sentiment Analysiscited by 2
- 2022Towards Explainable Social Agent Authoring tools: A case study on FAtiMA-Toolkitcited by 1
- 2021CHARET: Character-centered Approach to Emotion Tracking in Storiescited by 0
- 2025LLMs as Planning Formalizers: A Survey for Leveraging Large Language Models to Construct Automated Planning Models22 Mar 2025
- 2023Learning to Play Chess from Textbooks (LEAP): a Corpus for Evaluating Chess Moves based on Sentiment Analysis31 Oct 2023
- 2023Planning with Logical Graph-based Language Model for Instruction Generation26 Aug 2023
- 2023Automated Action Model Acquisition from Narrative Texts17 Jul 2023
- 2023Translating Natural Language to Planning Goals with Large-Language Models10 Feb 2023
- 2022Towards Explainable Social Agent Authoring tools: A case study on FAtiMA-Toolkit7 Jun 2022
- 2022Text-Based Action-Model Acquisition for Planning15 Feb 2022
- 2022Integrating AI Planning with Natural Language Processing: A Combination of Explicit and Tacit Knowledge15 Feb 2022
- 2022Leveraging Approximate Symbolic Models for Reinforcement Learning via Skill Diversity6 Feb 2022
- 2021Classical Planning in Deep Latent Space30 Jun 2021
- 2021GPT3-to-plan: Extracting plans from text using GPT-314 Jun 2021
- 2021CHARET: Character-centered Approach to Emotion Tracking in Stories15 Feb 2021