mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Do deep nets really need weight decay and dropout?

arXiv 1802.07042 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2018cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The impressive success of modern deep neural networks on computer vision tasks has been achieved through models of very large capacity compared to the number of available training examples. This overparameterization is often said to be controlled with the help of different regularization techniques, mainly weight decay and dropout. However, since these techniques reduce the effective capacity of the model, typically even deeper and wider architectures are required to compensate for the reduced capacity. Therefore, there seems to be a waste of capacity in this practice. In this paper we build upon recent research that suggests that explicit regularization may not be as important as widely believed and carry out an ablation study that concludes that weight decay and dropout may not be necessary for object recognition if enough data augmentation is introduced.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1.

2 papers.