mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Policy Gradients for Contextual Recommendations

arXiv 1802.04162 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2018cs.LGcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decision making is a challenging task in online recommender systems. The decision maker often needs to choose a contextual item at each step from a set of candidates. Contextual bandit algorithms have been successfully deployed to such applications, for the trade-off between exploration and exploitation and the state-of-art performance on minimizing online costs. However, the applicability of existing contextual bandit methods is limited by the over-simplified assumptions of the problem, such as assuming a simple form of the reward function or assuming a static environment where the states are not affected by previous actions. In this work, we put forward Policy Gradients for Contextual Recommendations (PGCR) to solve the problem without those unrealistic assumptions. It optimizes over a restricted class of policies where the marginal probability of choosing an item (in expectation of other items) has a simple closed form, and the gradient of the expected return over the policy in this class is in a succinct form. Moreover, PGCR leverages two useful heuristic techniques called Time-Dependent Greed and Actor-Dropout. The former ensures PGCR to be empirically greedy in the limit, and the latter addresses the trade-off between exploration and exploitation by using the policy network with Dropout as a Bayesian approximation. PGCR can solve the standard contextual bandits as well as its Markov Decision Process generalization. Therefore it can be applied to a wide range of realistic settings of recommendations, such as personalized advertising. We evaluate PGCR on toy datasets as well as a real-world dataset of personalized music recommendations. Experiments show that PGCR enables fast convergence and low regret, and outperforms both classic contextual-bandits and vanilla policy gradient methods.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 9; 2022: 7; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Personalized Transfer of User Preferences for Cross-domain Recommendationcited by 34
  2. 2022Contextual Bandits with Large Action Spaces: Made Practicalcited by 32
  3. 2025VideoScene: Distilling Video Diffusion Model to Generate 3D Scenes in One Stepcited by 27
  4. 2021A Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learning in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Review and Future Directionscited by 19
  5. 2023On the Opportunities and Challenges of Offline Reinforcement Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 10
  6. 2021Generative Adversarial Reward Learning for Generalized Behavior Tendency Inferencecited by 6
  7. 2022Examining Policy Entropy of Reinforcement Learning Agents for Personalization Taskscited by 3
  8. 2021Improving Long-Term Metrics in Recommendation Systems using Short-Horizon Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  9. 2022Contextual Decision Treescited by 2
  10. 2024Optimizing Novelty of Top-k Recommendations using Large Language Models and Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  11. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Product Recommender for Online Advertisingcited by 0
  12. 2021GuideBoot: Guided Bootstrap for Deep Contextual Banditscited by 0
9 more
  1. 2021SINGA-Easy: An Easy-to-Use Framework for MultiModal Analysiscited by 0
  2. 2021VisualTextRank: Unsupervised Graph-based Content Extraction for Automating Ad Text to Image Searchcited by 0
  3. 2021Text is NOT Enough: Integrating Visual Impressions into Open-domain Dialogue Generationcited by 0
  4. 2022Discovering Personalized Semantics for Soft Attributes in Recommender Systems using Concept Activation Vectorscited by 0
  5. 2022Reinforced MOOCs Concept Recommendation in Heterogeneous Information Networkscited by 0
  6. 2022Explanation-Guided Fairness Testing through Genetic Algorithmcited by 0
  7. 2022Using Graph Neural Networks for Program Terminationcited by 0
  8. 2023Tribe or Not? Critical Inspection of Group Differences Using TribalGramcited by 0
  9. 2024Improving Reward-Conditioned Policies for Multi-Armed Bandits using Normalized Weight Functionscited by 0