mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deception Detection in Videos

arXiv 1712.04415 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2017cs.AI cs.CVcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a system for covert automated deception detection in real-life courtroom trial videos. We study the importance of different modalities like vision, audio and text for this task. On the vision side, our system uses classifiers trained on low level video features which predict human micro-expressions. We show that predictions of high-level micro-expressions can be used as features for deception prediction. Surprisingly, IDT (Improved Dense Trajectory) features which have been widely used for action recognition, are also very good at predicting deception in videos. We fuse the score of classifiers trained on IDT features and high-level micro-expressions to improve performance. MFCC (Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficients) features from the audio domain also provide a significant boost in performance, while information from transcripts is not very beneficial for our system. Using various classifiers, our automated system obtains an AUC of 0.877 (10-fold cross-validation) when evaluated on subjects which were not part of the training set. Even though state-of-the-art methods use human annotations of micro-expressions for deception detection, our fully automated approach outperforms them by 5%. When combined with human annotations of micro-expressions, our AUC improves to 0.922. We also present results of a user-study to analyze how well do average humans perform on this task, what modalities they use for deception detection and how they perform if only one modality is accessible. Our project page can be found at urlhttps://doubaibai.github.io/DARE/.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Audio-Visual Deception Detection: DOLOS Dataset and Parameter-Efficient Crossmodal Learningcited by 14
  2. 2024Benchmarking Cross-Domain Audio-Visual Deception Detectioncited by 6
  3. 2025SVC 2025: the First Multimodal Deception Detection Challengecited by 5
  4. 2021Unsupervised Audio-Visual Subspace Alignment for High-Stakes Deception Detectioncited by 3
  5. 2021Deception Detection in Videos using the Facial Action Coding Systemcited by 2
  6. 2022Modeling Non-Cooperative Dialogue: Theoretical and Empirical Insightscited by 2
  7. 2022Explainable Verbal Deception Detection using Transformerscited by 2
  8. 2022Can lies be faked? Comparing low-stakes and high-stakes deception video datasets from a Machine Learning perspectivecited by 2
  9. 2021Constructing Robust Emotional State-based Feature with a Novel Voting Scheme for Multi-modal Deception Detection in Videoscited by 1
  10. 2021Machine Learning-based Lie Detector applied to a Novel Annotated Game Datasetcited by 1
  11. 2021Affect-Aware Deep Belief Network Representations for Multimodal Unsupervised Deception Detectioncited by 1
  12. 2023Flexible-modal Deception Detection with Audio-Visual Adaptercited by 1
8 more
  1. 2026DeceptionX: From Multimodal Evidence to Explainable Deception Detectioncited by 1
  2. 2021A Review of Web Infodemic Analysis and Detection Trends across Multi-modalities using Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
  3. 2023Automated Deception Detection from Videos: Using End-to-End Learning Based High-Level Features and Classification Approachescited by 0
  4. 2023LoRA-like Calibration for Multimodal Deception Detection using ATSFace Datacited by 0
  5. 2026DecepGPT: Schema-Driven Deception Detection with Multicultural Datasets and Robust Multimodal Learningcited by 0
  6. 2026SVC 2026: the Second Multimodal Deception Detection Challenge and the First Domain Generalized Remote Physiological Measurement Challengecited by 0
  7. 2026Artificial Intelligence can Recognize Whether a Job Applicant is Selling and/or Lying According to Facial Expressions and Head Movements Much More Correctly Than Human Interviewerscited by 0
  8. 2026Modality vs. Morphology: A Framework for Time Series Classification for Biological Signalscited by 0