Poverty Mapping Using Convolutional Neural Networks Trained on High and Medium Resolution Satellite Images, With an Application in Mexico
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mapping the spatial distribution of poverty in developing countries remains an important and costly challenge. These "poverty maps" are key inputs for poverty targeting, public goods provision, political accountability, and impact evaluation, that are all the more important given the geographic dispersion of the remaining bottom billion severely poor individuals. In this paper we train Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to estimate poverty directly from high and medium resolution satellite images. We use both Planet and Digital Globe imagery with spatial resolutions of 3-5 sq. m. and 50 sq. cm. respectively, covering all 2 million sq. km. of Mexico. Benchmark poverty estimates come from the 2014 MCS-ENIGH combined with the 2015 Intercensus and are used to estimate poverty rates for 2,456 Mexican municipalities. CNNs are trained using the 896 municipalities in the 2014 MCS-ENIGH. We experiment with several architectures (GoogleNet, VGG) and use GoogleNet as a final architecture where weights are fine-tuned from ImageNet. We find that 1) the best models, which incorporate satellite-estimated land use as a predictor, explain approximately 57% of the variation in poverty in a validation sample of 10 percent of MCS-ENIGH municipalities; 2) Across all MCS-ENIGH municipalities explanatory power reduces to 44% in a CNN prediction and landcover model; 3) Predicted poverty from the CNN predictions alone explains 47% of the variation in poverty in the validation sample, and 37% over all MCS-ENIGH municipalities; 4) In urban areas we see slight improvements from using Digital Globe versus Planet imagery, which explain 61% and 54% of poverty variation respectively. We conclude that CNNs can be trained end-to-end on satellite imagery to estimate poverty, although there is much work to be done to understand how the training process influences out of sample validation.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021SustainBench: Benchmarks for Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals with Machine Learningcited by 54
- 2024A Scoping Review of Earth Observation and Machine Learning for Causal Inference: Implications for the Geography of Povertycited by 5
- 2024The Berkeley Single Cell Computational Microscopy (BSCCM) Datasetcited by 2
- 2026A satellite foundation model for improved wealth monitoringcited by 2
- 2022Satellite Image and Machine Learning based Knowledge Extraction in the Poverty and Welfare Domaincited by 1
- 2025Platonic Representations for Poverty Mapping: Unified Vision-Language Codes or Agent-Induced Novelty?cited by 1
- 2022Incorporating High-Frequency Weather Data into Consumption Expenditure Predictionscited by 0
- 2022A Topic Modeling Approach to Classifying Open Street Map Health Clinics and Schools in Sub-Saharan Africacited by 0
- 2026A satellite foundation model for improved wealth monitoring25 Apr 2026
- 2025Platonic Representations for Poverty Mapping: Unified Vision-Language Codes or Agent-Induced Novelty?1 Aug 2025
- 2024A Scoping Review of Earth Observation and Machine Learning for Causal Inference: Implications for the Geography of Poverty30 May 2024
- 2024The Berkeley Single Cell Computational Microscopy (BSCCM) Dataset9 Feb 2024
- 2022A Topic Modeling Approach to Classifying Open Street Map Health Clinics and Schools in Sub-Saharan Africa22 Dec 2022
- 2022Incorporating High-Frequency Weather Data into Consumption Expenditure Predictions6 Oct 2022
- 2022Satellite Image and Machine Learning based Knowledge Extraction in the Poverty and Welfare Domain2 Mar 2022
- 2021SustainBench: Benchmarks for Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals with Machine Learning8 Nov 2021