Differential Privacy on Finite Computers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of designing and analyzing differentially private algorithms that can be implemented on em discrete models of computation in em strict polynomial time, motivated by known attacks on floating point implementations of real-arithmetic differentially private algorithms (Mironov, CCS 2012) and the potential for timing attacks on expected polynomial-time algorithms. As a case study, we examine the basic problem of approximating the histogram of a categorical dataset over a possibly large data universe X. The classic Laplace Mechanism (Dwork, McSherry, Nissim, Smith, TCC 2006 and J. Privacy & Confidentiality 2017) does not satisfy our requirements, as it is based on real arithmetic, and natural discrete analogues, such as the Geometric Mechanism (Ghosh, Roughgarden, Sundarajan, STOC 2009 and SICOMP 2012), take time at least linear in |X|, which can be exponential in the bit length of the input. In this paper, we provide strict polynomial-time discrete algorithms for approximate histograms whose simultaneous accuracy (the maximum error over all bins) matches that of the Laplace Mechanism up to constant factors, while retaining the same (pure) differential privacy guarantee. One of our algorithms produces a sparse histogram as output. Its "per-bin accuracy" (the error on individual bins) is worse than that of the Laplace Mechanism by a factor of log|X|, but we prove a lower bound showing that this is necessary for any algorithm that produces a sparse histogram. A second algorithm avoids this lower bound, and matches the per-bin accuracy of the Laplace Mechanism, by producing a compact and efficiently computable representation of a dense histogram, it is based on an (n+1)-wise independent implementation of an appropriately clamped version of the Discrete Geometric Mechanism.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2022Private Convex Optimization via Exponential Mechanismcited by 47
- 2023Privacy Amplification via Compression: Achieving the Optimal Privacy-Accuracy-Communication Trade-off in Distributed Mean Estimationcited by 22
- 2021Fairness, Integrity, and Privacy in a Scalable Blockchain-based Federated Learning Systemcited by 16
- 2025Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Securitycited by 4
- 2023Sparse Private LASSO Logistic Regressioncited by 3
- 2024The Correlated Gaussian Sparse Histogram Mechanismcited by 2
- 2026Lumberjack: Better Differentially Private Random Forests through Heavy Hitter Detection in Treescited by 0
- 2026Dithered Gaussian Mechanism for Randomness-Efficient Differential Privacycited by 0
- 2026Dithered Gaussian Mechanism for Randomness-Efficient Differential Privacy7 Jul 2026
- 2026Lumberjack: Better Differentially Private Random Forests through Heavy Hitter Detection in Trees21 May 2026
- 2025Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Security16 Jun 2025
- 2024The Correlated Gaussian Sparse Histogram Mechanism13 Dec 2024
- 2023Sparse Private LASSO Logistic Regression24 Apr 2023
- 2023Privacy Amplification via Compression: Achieving the Optimal Privacy-Accuracy-Communication Trade-off in Distributed Mean Estimation4 Apr 2023
- 2022Private Convex Optimization via Exponential Mechanism1 Mar 2022
- 2021Fairness, Integrity, and Privacy in a Scalable Blockchain-based Federated Learning System11 Nov 2021