Are you serious?: Rhetorical Questions and Sarcasm in Social Media Dialog
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Effective models of social dialog must understand a broad range of rhetorical and figurative devices. Rhetorical questions (RQs) are a type of figurative language whose aim is to achieve a pragmatic goal, such as structuring an argument, being persuasive, emphasizing a point, or being ironic. While there are computational models for other forms of figurative language, rhetorical questions have received little attention to date. We expand a small dataset from previous work, presenting a corpus of 10,270 RQs from debate forums and Twitter that represent different discourse functions. We show that we can clearly distinguish between RQs and sincere questions (0.76 F1). We then show that RQs can be used both sarcastically and non-sarcastically, observing that non-sarcastic (other) uses of RQs are frequently argumentative in forums, and persuasive in tweets. We present experiments to distinguish between these uses of RQs using SVM and LSTM models that represent linguistic features and post-level context, achieving results as high as 0.76 F1 for "sarcastic" and 0.77 F1 for "other" in forums, and 0.83 F1 for both "sarcastic" and "other" in tweets. We supplement our quantitative experiments with an in-depth characterization of the linguistic variation in RQs.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2022When did you become so smart, oh wise one?! Sarcasm Explanation in Multi-modal Multi-party Dialoguescited by 33
- 2024How Did We Get Here? Summarizing Conversation Dynamicscited by 6
- 2026Rhetorical Questions in LLM Representations: A Linear Probing Studycited by 3
- 2022Computational Sarcasm Analysis on Social Media: A Systematic Reviewcited by 2
- 2023"When Words Fail, Emojis Prevail": Generating Sarcastic Utterances with Emoji Using Valence Reversal and Semantic Incongruitycited by 1
- 2025A Similarity Measure for Comparing Conversational Dynamicscited by 1
- 2026What Makes a Good Query? Measuring the Impact of Human-Confusing Linguistic Features on LLM Performancecited by 0
- 2026Rhetorical Questions in LLM Representations: A Linear Probing Study15 Apr 2026
- 2026What Makes a Good Query? Measuring the Impact of Human-Confusing Linguistic Features on LLM Performance23 Feb 2026
- 2025A Similarity Measure for Comparing Conversational Dynamics25 Jul 2025
- 2024How Did We Get Here? Summarizing Conversation Dynamics29 Apr 2024
- 2023"When Words Fail, Emojis Prevail": Generating Sarcastic Utterances with Emoji Using Valence Reversal and Semantic Incongruity6 May 2023
- 2022Computational Sarcasm Analysis on Social Media: A Systematic Review13 Sep 2022
- 2022When did you become so smart, oh wise one?! Sarcasm Explanation in Multi-modal Multi-party Dialogues12 Mar 2022