Neural Networks Compression for Language Modeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we consider several compression techniques for the language modeling problem based on recurrent neural networks (RNNs). It is known that conventional RNNs, e.g, LSTM-based networks in language modeling, are characterized with either high space complexity or substantial inference time. This problem is especially crucial for mobile applications, in which the constant interaction with the remote server is inappropriate. By using the Penn Treebank (PTB) dataset we compare pruning, quantization, low-rank factorization, tensor train decomposition for LSTM networks in terms of model size and suitability for fast inference.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021A Survey on Green Deep Learningcited by 52
- 2022A Survey on Model Compression and Acceleration for Pretrained Language Modelscited by 45
- 2024On Efficient Variants of Segment Anything Model: A Surveycited by 16
- 2021Doping: A technique for efficient compression of LSTM models using sparse structured additive matricescited by 5
- 2024On Efficient Variants of Segment Anything Model: A Survey7 Oct 2024
- 2022A Survey on Model Compression and Acceleration for Pretrained Language Models15 Feb 2022
- 2021A Survey on Green Deep Learning8 Nov 2021
- 2021Doping: A technique for efficient compression of LSTM models using sparse structured additive matrices14 Feb 2021