Learning Deep Energy Models: Contrastive Divergence vs. Amortized MLE
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a number of new algorithms for learning deep energy models and demonstrate their properties. We show that our SteinCD performs well in term of test likelihood, while SteinGAN performs well in terms of generating realistic looking images. Our results suggest promising directions for learning better models by combining GAN-style methods with traditional energy-based learning.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023Layer Collaboration in the Forward-Forward Algorithmcited by 19
- 2021Learning Equivariant Energy Based Models with Equivariant Stein Variational Gradient Descentcited by 10
- 2023Training Energy-Based Models with Diffusion Contrastive Divergencescited by 9
- 2025Score Matching With Missing Datacited by 7
- 2025AmorLIP: Efficient Language-Image Pretraining via Amortizationcited by 2
- 2025Score Matching With Missing Data31 May 2025
- 2025AmorLIP: Efficient Language-Image Pretraining via Amortization25 May 2025
- 2023Training Energy-Based Models with Diffusion Contrastive Divergences4 Jul 2023
- 2023Layer Collaboration in the Forward-Forward Algorithm21 May 2023
- 2021Learning Equivariant Energy Based Models with Equivariant Stein Variational Gradient Descent15 Jun 2021