Non-negative Matrix Factorization via Archetypal Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given a collection of data points, non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) suggests to express them as convex combinations of a small set of `archetypes' with non-negative entries. This decomposition is unique only if the true archetypes are non-negative and sufficiently sparse (or the weights are sufficiently sparse), a regime that is captured by the separability condition and its generalizations. In this paper, we study an approach to NMF that can be traced back to the work of Cutler and Breiman (1994) and does not require the data to be separable, while providing a generally unique decomposition. We optimize the trade-off between two objectives: we minimize the distance of the data points from the convex envelope of the archetypes (which can be interpreted as an empirical risk), while minimizing the distance of the archetypes from the convex envelope of the data (which can be interpreted as a data-dependent regularization). The archetypal analysis method of (Cutler, Breiman, 1994) is recovered as the limiting case in which the last term is given infinite weight. We introduce a `uniqueness condition' on the data which is necessary for exactly recovering the archetypes from noiseless data. We prove that, under uniqueness (plus additional regularity conditions on the geometry of the archetypes), our estimator is robust. While our approach requires solving a non-convex optimization problem, we find that standard optimization methods succeed in finding good solutions both for real and synthetic data.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 May 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 6.
11 papers.
- 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 73
- 2025A Survey on Archetypal Analysiscited by 6
- 2021Probabilistic methods for approximate archetypal analysiscited by 4
- 2024Improved Algorithm and Bounds for Successive Projectioncited by 3
- 2021Learning Topic Models: Identifiability and Finite-Sample Analysiscited by 2
- 2025SpeedCP: Fast Kernel-based Conditional Conformal Predictioncited by 2
- 2025Nonnegative matrix factorizations and related compositional models: Equivalence, identifiability, and an application on the grain-size analysis of sedimentscited by 1
- 2021Time series forecasting from partial observations via Non-negative Matrix Factorizationcited by 0
- 2023Interpretable factorization of clinical questionnaires to identify latent factors of psychopathologycited by 0
- 2025BenchMake: Turn any scientific data set into a reproducible benchmarkcited by 0
- 2025Semi-supervised Vertex Hunting, with Applications in Network and Text Analysiscited by 0
- 2025Nonnegative matrix factorizations and related compositional models: Equivalence, identifiability, and an application on the grain-size analysis of sediments25 Dec 2025
- 2025Semi-supervised Vertex Hunting, with Applications in Network and Text Analysis26 Oct 2025
- 2025SpeedCP: Fast Kernel-based Conditional Conformal Prediction28 Sep 2025
- 2025BenchMake: Turn any scientific data set into a reproducible benchmark29 Jun 2025
- 2025A Survey on Archetypal Analysis16 Apr 2025
- 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Models18 Feb 2025
- 2024Improved Algorithm and Bounds for Successive Projection16 Mar 2024
- 2023Interpretable factorization of clinical questionnaires to identify latent factors of psychopathology12 Dec 2023
- 2021Learning Topic Models: Identifiability and Finite-Sample Analysis8 Oct 2021
- 2021Probabilistic methods for approximate archetypal analysis12 Aug 2021
- 2021Time series forecasting from partial observations via Non-negative Matrix Factorization10 Feb 2021