mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

People on Media: Jointly Identifying Credible News and Trustworthy Citizen Journalists in Online Communities

arXiv 1705.02667 ↗First posted 7 May 2017cs.AI cs.CL cs.IRcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Media seems to have become more partisan, often providing a biased coverage of news catering to the interest of specific groups. It is therefore essential to identify credible information content that provides an objective narrative of an event. News communities such as digg, reddit, or newstrust offer recommendations, reviews, quality ratings, and further insights on journalistic works. However, there is a complex interaction between different factors in such online communities: fairness and style of reporting, language clarity and objectivity, topical perspectives (like political viewpoint), expertise and bias of community members, and more. This paper presents a model to systematically analyze the different interactions in a news community between users, news, and sources. We develop a probabilistic graphical model that leverages this joint interaction to identify 1) highly credible news articles, 2) trustworthy news sources, and 3) expert users who perform the role of "citizen journalists" in the community. Our method extends CRF models to incorporate real-valued ratings, as some communities have very fine-grained scales that cannot be easily discretized without losing information. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first full-fledged analysis of credibility, trust, and expertise in news communities.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 May 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

10 papers.