People on Media: Jointly Identifying Credible News and Trustworthy Citizen Journalists in Online Communities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Media seems to have become more partisan, often providing a biased coverage of news catering to the interest of specific groups. It is therefore essential to identify credible information content that provides an objective narrative of an event. News communities such as digg, reddit, or newstrust offer recommendations, reviews, quality ratings, and further insights on journalistic works. However, there is a complex interaction between different factors in such online communities: fairness and style of reporting, language clarity and objectivity, topical perspectives (like political viewpoint), expertise and bias of community members, and more. This paper presents a model to systematically analyze the different interactions in a news community between users, news, and sources. We develop a probabilistic graphical model that leverages this joint interaction to identify 1) highly credible news articles, 2) trustworthy news sources, and 3) expert users who perform the role of "citizen journalists" in the community. Our method extends CRF models to incorporate real-valued ratings, as some communities have very fine-grained scales that cannot be easily discretized without losing information. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first full-fledged analysis of credibility, trust, and expertise in news communities.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 May 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021A Survey on Stance Detection for Mis- and Disinformation Identificationcited by 75
- 2021Overview of the CLEF--2021 CheckThat! Lab on Detecting Check-Worthy Claims, Previously Fact-Checked Claims, and Fake Newscited by 23
- 2021A Survey on Predicting the Factuality and the Bias of News Mediacited by 20
- 2021Overview of the CLEF-2019 CheckThat!: Automatic Identification and Verification of Claimscited by 18
- 2025Resolving Conflicting Evidence in Automated Fact-Checking: A Study on Retrieval-Augmented LLMscited by 16
- 2021Dataset of Fake News Detection and Fact Verification: A Surveycited by 11
- 2024Reliability Estimation of News Media Sources: Birds of a Feather Flock Togethercited by 7
- 2023Predicting Sentence-Level Factuality of News and Bias of Media Outletscited by 6
- 2022Combining Machine Learning with Knowledge Engineering to detect Fake News in Social Networks-a surveycited by 4
- 2026A Multi-View Media Profiling Suite: Resources, Evaluation, and Analysiscited by 0
- 2026A Multi-View Media Profiling Suite: Resources, Evaluation, and Analysis2 May 2026
- 2025Resolving Conflicting Evidence in Automated Fact-Checking: A Study on Retrieval-Augmented LLMs23 May 2025
- 2024Reliability Estimation of News Media Sources: Birds of a Feather Flock Together15 Apr 2024
- 2023Predicting Sentence-Level Factuality of News and Bias of Media Outlets27 Jan 2023
- 2022Combining Machine Learning with Knowledge Engineering to detect Fake News in Social Networks-a survey20 Jan 2022
- 2021Dataset of Fake News Detection and Fact Verification: A Survey5 Nov 2021
- 2021Overview of the CLEF-2019 CheckThat!: Automatic Identification and Verification of Claims25 Sep 2021
- 2021Overview of the CLEF--2021 CheckThat! Lab on Detecting Check-Worthy Claims, Previously Fact-Checked Claims, and Fake News23 Sep 2021
- 2021A Survey on Predicting the Factuality and the Bias of News Media16 Mar 2021
- 2021A Survey on Stance Detection for Mis- and Disinformation Identification27 Feb 2021