Who's Better? Who's Best? Pairwise Deep Ranking for Skill Determination
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a method for assessing skill from video, applicable to a variety of tasks, ranging from surgery to drawing and rolling pizza dough. We formulate the problem as pairwise (who's better?) and overall (who's best?) ranking of video collections, using supervised deep ranking. We propose a novel loss function that learns discriminative features when a pair of videos exhibit variance in skill, and learns shared features when a pair of videos exhibit comparable skill levels. Results demonstrate our method is applicable across tasks, with the percentage of correctly ordered pairs of videos ranging from 70% to 83% for four datasets. We demonstrate the robustness of our approach via sensitivity analysis of its parameters. We see this work as effort toward the automated organization of how-to video collections and overall, generic skill determination in video.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Group-aware Contrastive Regression for Action Quality Assessmentcited by 75
- 2021Deep Neural Networks for the Assessment of Surgical Skills: A Systematic Reviewcited by 9
- 2022Video-based Formative and Summative Assessment of Surgical Tasks using Deep Learningcited by 8
- 2024Cognitive-Motor Integration in Assessing Bimanual Motor Skillscited by 0
- 2024Cognitive-Motor Integration in Assessing Bimanual Motor Skills16 Apr 2024
- 2022Video-based Formative and Summative Assessment of Surgical Tasks using Deep Learning17 Mar 2022
- 2021Group-aware Contrastive Regression for Action Quality Assessment17 Aug 2021
- 2021Deep Neural Networks for the Assessment of Surgical Skills: A Systematic Review3 Mar 2021