mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Who's Better? Who's Best? Pairwise Deep Ranking for Skill Determination

arXiv 1703.09913 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2017cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a method for assessing skill from video, applicable to a variety of tasks, ranging from surgery to drawing and rolling pizza dough. We formulate the problem as pairwise (who's better?) and overall (who's best?) ranking of video collections, using supervised deep ranking. We propose a novel loss function that learns discriminative features when a pair of videos exhibit variance in skill, and learns shared features when a pair of videos exhibit comparable skill levels. Results demonstrate our method is applicable across tasks, with the percentage of correctly ordered pairs of videos ranging from 70% to 83% for four datasets. We demonstrate the robustness of our approach via sensitivity analysis of its parameters. We see this work as effort toward the automated organization of how-to video collections and overall, generic skill determination in video.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

4 papers.