Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Summary Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to explain observed strategic behavior by fitting reinforcement learning models to behavioral data. However, traditional IRL methods are only applicable when the observations are in the form of state-action paths. This assumption may not hold in many real-world modeling settings, where only partial or summarized observations are available. In general, we may assume that there is a summarizing function σ, which acts as a filter between us and the true state-action paths that constitute the demonstration. Some initial approaches to extending IRL to such situations have been presented, but with very specific assumptions about the structure of σ, such as that only certain state observations are missing. This paper instead focuses on the most general case of the problem, where no assumptions are made about the summarizing function, except that it can be evaluated. We demonstrate that inference is still possible. The paper presents exact and approximate inference algorithms that allow full posterior inference, which is particularly important for assessing parameter uncertainty in this challenging inference situation. Empirical scalability is demonstrated to reasonably sized problems, and practical applicability is demonstrated by estimating the posterior for a cognitive science RL model based on an observed user's task completion time only.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2020: 1; 2021: 0; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025AgentA/B: Automated and Scalable Web A/BTesting with Interactive LLM Agentscited by 19
- 2022Automated Play-Testing Through RL Based Human-Like Play-Styles Generationcited by 11
- 2020Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Collective Animal Movementcited by 3
- 2023Amortised Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation for User Models of Pointingcited by 1
- 2023Adversarial Imitation Learning On Aggregated Datacited by 1
- 2025AgentA/B: Automated and Scalable Web A/BTesting with Interactive LLM Agents13 Apr 2025
- 2023Adversarial Imitation Learning On Aggregated Data14 Nov 2023
- 2023Amortised Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation for User Models of Pointing19 Jul 2023
- 2022Automated Play-Testing Through RL Based Human-Like Play-Styles Generation29 Nov 2022
- 2020Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Collective Animal Movement8 Sep 2020
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2018A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progress
- 2026Quantifying Potential Observation Missingness in Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- 2023Is Inverse Reinforcement Learning Harder than Standard Reinforcement Learning? A Theoretical Perspective
- 2019Maximum Likelihood Constraint Inference for Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- 2018Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Nonparametric Spatio-Temporal Subgoal Modeling
- 2021Task-Guided Inverse Reinforcement Learning Under Partial Information
- 2024Quantifying the Sensitivity of Inverse Reinforcement Learning to Misspecification
- 2022Maximum-Likelihood Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Finite-Time Guarantees