mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Worst-case Complexity of Cyclic Coordinate Descent: O(n2) Gap with Randomized Version

arXiv 1604.07130 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2016math.OC cs.CC cs.NAcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper concerns the worst-case complexity of cyclic coordinate descent (C-CD) for minimizing a convex quadratic function, which is equivalent to Gauss-Seidel method and can be transformed to Kaczmarz method and projection onto convex sets (POCS). We observe that the known provable complexity of C-CD can be O(n2) times slower than randomized coordinate descent (R-CD), but no example was rigorously proven to exhibit such a large gap. In this paper we show that the gap indeed exists. We prove that there exists an example for which C-CD takes at least O(n4 kappaCD logfrac1ε) operations, where kappaCD is related to Demmel's condition number and it determines the convergence rate of R-CD. It implies that in the worst case C-CD can indeed be O(n2) times slower than R-CD, which has complexity O( n2 kappaCD logfrac1ε). Note that for this example, the gap exists for any fixed update order, not just a particular order. Based on the example, we establish several almost tight complexity bounds of C-CD for quadratic problems. One difficulty with the analysis is that the spectral radius of a non-symmetric iteration matrix does not necessarily constitute a textitlower bound for the convergence rate. An immediate consequence is that for Gauss-Seidel method, Kaczmarz method and POCS, there is also an O(n2) gap between the cyclic versions and randomized versions (for solving linear systems). We also show that the classical convergence rate of POCS by Smith, Solmon and Wager [1] is always worse and sometimes can be infinitely times worse than our bound.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2.

6 papers.